Linear functions/operators conflicting understanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonnyb42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
Linear functions and operators are defined by two conditions: f(ax) = a f(x) and f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). A common point of confusion arises with the equation of a line, y = mx + b, which is only linear if the constant b equals zero; otherwise, it represents an affine transformation. The distinction between linear and affine transformations is crucial in theoretical physics and mathematics. Understanding this difference clarifies why some equations that appear linear do not meet the strict criteria for linearity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing these definitions in mathematical contexts.
Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
So in my theoretical physics class my professor was reminding us ("reminding") of what "linear" means, such as a linear functions or a linear operator. He said the definition was:

1. f(ax) = a f(x)

2. f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)

Functions or operators are "linear" if they meet the above 2 conditions.
I am confused because, if I take a line... y = mx + b, which I completely consider to be linear, it doesnt' match either of those conditions.

Are there 2 different kinds of linear, am I losing my mind... or what?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Back
Top