Linear independence of basis vectors

cappygal
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How do I prove the linear independence of the standard basis vectors? My book is helpful by giving the definition of linear independence and a couple examples, but never once shows how to prove that they are linearly independent.
I know that the list of standard basis vectors is linearly independent if:
The only choice of a_1, a_2, ... a_m that makes a_1v_1+a_2v_2+...+a_mv_m=0 is a_1=a_2=...=a_m=0.
But i don't know where to go from there .. any help would be appreciated :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use contradiction. If they were linearly dependent, then by your definition, at least one of the vectors could be written as a linear combination of others. Is this true of the standard basis ?
 
For example, in \mathbb{R}^3, the standard basis is:

\left\{ {\left( {1,0,0} \right),\left( {0,1,0} \right),\left( {0,0,1} \right)} \right\}

This basis is linearly independant if, as you say:

a\left( {1,0,0} \right) + b\left( {0,1,0} \right) + c\left( {0,0,1} \right) = \left( {0,0,0} \right)

implies that a = b = c = 0.

Well, solve the condition for a, b and c and see if you can find anything else besides the solution we expect.
Can you now see how it will be for \mathbb{R}^n in general?
 
Thank you so much .. it actually makes sense now .. Something about being out of school with a broken pelvis means that it's harder to understand what they do in class without you ... thanks!
 
No problem :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top