Linear mass density and dangling rope.

AI Thread Summary
To find the tension in a rope of mass M and length L hanging from a branch under gravity, the proposed equation F(r) = (Mg/L)(r) is accurate when r is measured upward from the bottom of the rope. The tension increases linearly from the bottom to the top of the rope due to the weight of the rope below any point r. This means that the tension at any position can be calculated using this linear relationship. If r is defined differently, the equation may need adjustment. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing forces in a hanging rope system.
Timothy S
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
A rope of mass M and length of L is dangling from a branch. The only force acting on it is gravity. The question is how do you find the tension of the rope at any position on the rope.

My proposed equation is this: F(r) = (Mg/L)(r) where r is any position on the rope. Is this equation correct? If it is incorrect what equation would be able to describe what I am asking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Timothy S said:
A rope of mass M and length of L is dangling from a branch. The only force acting on it is gravity. The question is how do you find the tension of the rope at any position on the rope.

My proposed equation is this: F(r) = (Mg/L)(r) where r is any position on the rope. Is this equation correct? If it is incorrect what equation would be able to describe what I am asking?
It is correct if r is the distance measured upward from the bottom of the rope.

Chet
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top