Linear Momentum and Collisions of meteor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Earth's recoil speed, the fraction of the meteor's kinetic energy transformed into the Earth's kinetic energy, and the change in the Earth's kinetic energy after a meteor impact. It emphasizes the application of conservation of momentum principles due to the inelastic nature of the collision, where kinetic energy is not conserved. The initial momentum equation is established, considering the meteor's mass and speed, and the Earth's initial velocity is zero. Participants clarify that after the collision, both the Earth and the meteor move with the same velocity, allowing for straightforward calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions in solving the problem.
wildr0id
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A meteor whose mass was about 10^8 kg struck the Earth (m = 6.0 X10^24 kg) with a speed of about 11 km/s and came to rest in the Earth.
(a) What was the Earth's recoil speed? (m/s)

(b) What fraction of the meteor's kinetic energy was transformed to kinetic energy of the Earth? (%)

(c) By how much did the Earth's kinetic energy change as a result of this collision? (J)

I know this problem requires a look at conservation of momentum and conservation of energy principles, but I am having trouble just trying to start this problem out
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that u need to apply the law of conservation of momentum.Well,then do it...I'm afraid you're dealing with a plastic collision for which the KE is not really conserved...

Daniel.
 
This is a "completely inelastic" collision- Kinetic energy is not conserved so you cannot use that.

You do, however, know that the Earth has 0 velocity initially and that both the Earth and the asteroid have the same velocity after.

Mava+ Meve= Mav'a+ Mev'e ("e" subscripts are "earth", "a" subscripts are "asteroid". v' is after the collision.) becomes Mav= (Ma+ Me)v'.

You know Ma, Me, and v. Solve for v'. Once you know that you can calculate the kinetic energy of the asteroid and Earth after the collision and compare it with those values before the collision.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top