Linear Momentum: Homework for Block on Triangular Block

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a triangular block when a smaller block slides down its surface, with an emphasis on conservation of linear momentum and energy. The initial attempt at a solution incorrectly mixed variables and did not account for the gravitational forces acting on the smaller block. It was pointed out that the conservation of energy equation used the same variable 'u' for different contexts, leading to confusion. The need for clarity in defining variables and considering the system's dynamics, including the angle of inclination, was highlighted. The conversation concludes with a request for further hints to solve the problem correctly.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m is placed on a triangular block of mass M, which in turn is placed on a horizontal surface. Assuming frictionless surfaces, calculate the velocity of the triangular block when the smaller block reaches the bottom end. The angle of inclination of triangular block is theta.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



When the small block reaches bottom of the surface, linear momentum in x-direction is conserved.

Mv=m(u-v) where v is the absolute velocity of triangular block
i.e. v=mu/(M+m) and u is the relative velocity of small block

by applying conservation of energy,
u=(2gh)^2

but the answer is not v=[m(2gh)^2]/(M+m)

It is very complex in terms of theta.
Where am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have failed to consider that the system is not an isolated one; there is a net gravitational force acting on the small block.
 
I considered the Linear momentum only in x-direction. There is no net external force acting in x-direction.
 
A key thing is that your answer does not appear to involve theta - this implies that you have mixed up your 'u's. Your first 'u' would be the relative velocity of the small block in the x-direction, but in your COE equation, you used 'u' again to denote the velocity of the small block - this time not just in the x-direction.
 
Fightfish said:
A key thing is that your answer does not appear to involve theta - this implies that you have mixed up your 'u's. Your first 'u' would be the relative velocity of the small block in the x-direction, but in your COE equation, you used 'u' again to denote the velocity of the small block - this time not just in the x-direction.

Then please give me some hints on solving this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top