Linear operators and change of basis

"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
Following on from a previous post of mine about linear operators, I'm trying to firm up my understanding of changing between bases for a given vector space.

For a given vector space V over some scalar field \mathbb{F}, and two basis sets \mathcal{B} = \lbrace\mathbf{e}_{i}\rbrace_{i=1,\ldots , n} and \mathcal{B}' = \lbrace\mathbf{e}'_{i}\rbrace_{i=1,\ldots , n} which form two given bases for V, we can express any vector \mathbf{v} \in V as a unique linear combination with respect to each of these bases, i.e. \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \mathbf{v}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}v_{i}\mathbf{e}_{i} \quad\text{and}\quad \mathbf{v} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}v'_{i}\mathbf{e}'_{i} Now, suppose we have some linear operator \mathcal{S}:V \longrightarrow V which maps the basis \mathcal{B} to the basis \mathcal{B}', defined in the following manner \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\mathcal{S} \left(\mathbf{e}_{j}\right)= \mathbf{e}'_{j} As \mathcal{S} \left(\mathbf{e}_{j}\right) \in V is itself a vector in V we can express it as a linear combination of the basis vectors \mathbf{e}_{i} \;\; \left(i=1, \ldots , n\right), \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\mathbf{e}'_{j}= \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(\mathcal{S} \left(\mathbf{e}_{j}\right)\right)_{i}\mathbf{e}_{i}= \sum_{i=1}^{n}S_{ij}\mathbf{e}_{i} where S_{ij}\equiv \left(\mathcal{S} \left(\mathbf{e}_{j}\right)\right)_{i} is the i^{th} component of the j^{th} basis vector \mathbf{e}'_{j} with respect to the basis \mathcal{B}. The S_{ij}\equiv \left(\mathcal{S} \left(\mathbf{e}_{j}\right)\right)_{i} are the components of the linear operator \mathcal{S} with respect to the basis \mathcal{B}. The columns of \left[\mathcal{S}\right]_{\mathcal{B}} are the column vector representations of the vectors \mathbf{e}'_{j} \in \mathcal{B}' with respect to the basis \mathcal{B}.

Would this be a correct description? Thanks for your time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks great. I would just say "field" instead of "scalar field", because the latter term makes me think of functions defined on a manifold.
 
Ah ok. thanks for your help Fredrik.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Back
Top