Linear operators & the uncertainty principle

Ahmes
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I try to understand the proof for the uncertainty principle for two Hermitian operators A and B in a Hilbert space. My questions are rather general so you don't need to know the specific proof.

The first thing I couldn't get into my head was the definition of uncertainty
(\Delta A)^2=\langle\psi|(A- \langle A \rangle)^2|\psi\rangle
Using the properties of the inner product I can be convinced this is equivalent to the ordinary definition of (\Delta A)^2=\langle A^2 \rangle-{\langle A \rangle}^2 BUT A is an operator and \langle A \rangle is a number! How can (A- \langle A \rangle)^2 even be defined?

Second - somewhere else in the proof a new vector is defined |\varphi \rangle=C| \psi \rangle OK, they can do it, but then they say that if so, then also \langle \varphi |= \langle \psi | C^\dagger and I just can't see why... Why the dagger I mean

Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with adding a scalar to an operator, since you can interpret every scalar itself as an operator. It just multiplies the vector it acts upon by the scalar. If it helps, you can also imagine the identity operator next to it.

By the way, the ordinary definition of (\Delta A)^2 is either \langle (A-\langle A \rangle)^2\rangle, or \langle A^2 \rangle-{\langle A \rangle}^2. They are identical ofcourse, but from the former you can easily see that
(\Delta A)^2=\langle\psi|(A- \langle A \rangle)^2|\psi\rangle

since, for any operator \langle Q \rangle = \angle \psi|Q|\psi \rangle.

The bra associated with the ket C|\psi \rangle is \langle \psi|C^\dagger, I`m sure that's explained in your book somewhere.
\langle \psi |C|\psi\rangle^*=\langle \psi |C^\dagger|\psi\rangle
 
Thanks.
It took me quite a while to convince myself about the latter...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top