I Linearization of Lagrange equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the linearization of Lagrange equations, particularly the expansion of the A matrix and its inverse. The user seeks clarification on how to derive the function f and the order of magnitude for small displacements, using q0 as a center. There is a debate on whether the quadratic form G is linear in terms of the velocities and if the matrix A can be assumed to be symmetric and diagonalizable. The kinetic energy matrix is emphasized as a key component in the Lagrangian formulation, with the user interested in expanding the inverse of A. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering Lagrange mechanics.
stefano77
Messages
20
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
linearization lagrange equation
l am italian student from Milan university, so sorry for my bad english.
l am studying lagrange meccanics. We are linearizating lagrange equations. Here l don't understand how you can expand A matrix, how the function f is derivable, how the inverse matrix A is expanded? l am expanding with q0 center, x is the small displacement . G is a quadratic form.
O(|x|) is order of magnitude

1604917727355.png
 

Attachments

  • 1604917007307.png
    1604917007307.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 193
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean, $$G(q,\dot q)=\sum_{ij}A_{ij}~q_i\dot q_j,$$ is linear in ##\dot{q}_i##? Or,
$$G=\sum A_{ij}(q)\dot{q}_i\dot{q}_j$$
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Can we assume anything about ##A##? Is it symmetric?
 
L = T - V ## T = \sum a_{ij}(q) q'_i q'_j## $$ A= [a_{ij}] $$

## G_h(q,q')= \sum_{jl} \frac {\partial\a_{hj}} {\partial q_l} q'_l q'_j + \sum_{ij} \frac {\partial\a_{ij}} {2 \partial q_h} q'_l q'_j##
but l am interestin how to expand ## [A(q)]^{-1}## with ##q_0## as center
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
A is symmetri...
it is kinetic energy matrix
L is a natural lagrangian
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
stefano77 said:
A is symmetri...
it is kinetic energy matrix
L is a natural lagrangian

I think it's also diagonalizable. In which case

##A^{-1}_{ii} = \frac{1}{A_{ii}}##
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top