Linearizing system of differential equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linearization and classification of fixed points for a system of differential equations involving two variables, θ1 and θ2, with a parameter Ω. The equations describe the dynamics influenced by sinusoidal terms and the parameter Ω, which affects the existence of critical points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore methods for linearizing the system without knowing the value of Ω and discuss the implications of this uncertainty on finding fixed points. There are attempts to derive simultaneous equations from setting the derivatives to zero, leading to critical points expressed in terms of Ω. Questions arise regarding the correct formulation of linearization and the interpretation of variables θ1 and Θ1.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the linearization process and the presence of multiple angles. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the critical points and the linearization around them, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values for Ω that influence the number of critical points, as well as the context of the problem relating to arrays of Josephson junctions. The discussion acknowledges the complexity introduced by the parameter Ω and the need for careful consideration of the angles involved in the system.

MellyC
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Linearize and classify the fixed points of
[itex]\frac{d\theta1}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\Omega[/itex] + sin [itex]\theta1[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] (sin[itex]\theta[/itex]1 + sin[itex]\theta[/itex]2)

[itex]\frac{d\theta2}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\Omega[/itex] + sin [itex]\theta2[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] (sin[itex]\theta[/itex]1 + sin[itex]\theta[/itex]2)
I know that if the absolute value of omega is less than two, there will be 4 critical points, and if the absolute value of omega is greater than two, there will be no critical points. I have found the Jacobian,

[itex]\frac{3}{2}[/itex] cos[itex]\theta1[/itex] [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] cos[itex]\theta2[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] cos[itex]\theta1[/itex] [itex]\frac{3}{2}[/itex] cos[itex]\theta2[/itex]

My problem is that I do not understand how to linearize this system of equations when I do not know the value of omega, because without knowing the value of omega, I cannot solve for [itex]\theta1[/itex] or [itex]\theta2[/itex]. Any advice regarding how to linearize this system, and from linearizing the system classify the fixed points, would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MellyC said:
Linearize and classify the fixed points of
[itex]\frac{d\theta1}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\Omega[/itex] + sin [itex]\theta1[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] (sin[itex]\theta[/itex]1 + sin[itex]\theta[/itex]2)

[itex]\frac{d\theta2}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]\Omega[/itex] + sin [itex]\theta2[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] (sin[itex]\theta[/itex]1 + sin[itex]\theta[/itex]2)

Well, here's my hack at this strange system. Setting [itex]\frac{d\theta_{1}}{dt} = 0[/itex] and [itex]\frac{d\theta_{2}}{dt} = 0[/itex] leads us to the simultaneous equations

[itex]\frac{3}{2} sin \theta_{1} + \frac{1}{2} sin \theta_{2} = -\Omega[/itex] and [itex]\frac{1}{2} sin \theta_{1} + \frac{3}{2} sin \theta_{2} = -\Omega \Rightarrow sin \theta_{1} = sin \theta_{2} = -\frac{\Omega}{2} .[/itex]

It is now clear why the character of the system changes at [itex]\Omega = 2[/itex] . We also see that in the "principal square" [itex][ 0 , 2\pi) \times [ 0 , 2\pi)[/itex] , there will be four critical points; for instance, with [itex]\Omega = 1[/itex] , the solution "angles" are [itex]\frac{7\pi}{6}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{11\pi}{6}[/itex] , so the critical points lie at [itex]( \theta_{1} , \theta_{2} )[/itex] , where the ordered pairs have every combination of the two solution angles.

That indicates that someplace nice like the origin is not generally an equilibrium point, so we have to linearize around the (usually) four critical points. If we call the two "solution angles" [itex]\Theta_{1} , \Theta_{2}[/itex] , then the linearizations are going to look like

[tex]\sin \theta_{1} = \sin \Theta_{1} + [ \cos \Theta_{1} \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex]

and something similar for [itex]\sin \theta_{2}[/itex]. But we know that [itex]\sin \Theta_{1} = -\frac{\Omega}{2}[/itex] , so [itex]\cos \Theta_{1} = \pm \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } *[/itex] (which also gives us a better idea of what sort of change is going to take place at [itex]\Omega = 2[/itex] ). So the linearization in the neighborhood of a critical point is

[tex]\sin \theta_{1} = ( -\frac{\Omega}{2} ) \pm [ \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex]

and similarly for [itex]\sin \theta_{2}[/itex].

* the plus-or-minus sign must be resolved according to the "appropriate quadrant" for the angles [itex]\Theta_{1}[/itex] or [itex]\Theta_{2}[/itex]Try it from here and see if that helps.

EDIT: I pressed on somewhat further. Something very nice happens for the linearization in the [itex]\frac{1}{2} (\sin \theta_{1} + \sin \theta_{2})[/itex] term , with the result that the entire expressions for [itex]\frac{d\theta_{1}}{dt}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{d\theta_{2}}{dt}[/itex] collapse into something fairly simple. That's a pleasant surprise! Just out of curiosity, what is the context or the application for this dynamical system?
 
Last edited:
I had some questions regarding your solution.

First of all, for the solution [tex]\sin \theta_{1} = ( -\frac{\Omega}{2} ) \pm [ \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex], should it not be [tex]\sin \theta_{1} = ( -\frac{\Omega}{2} ) \pm 1/2[ \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex]? Or if not, where did the 1/2 go?

Additionally, in the same solution, I am a bit confused regarding the presence of both θ1 and Θ1. I expected to only have two angles (θ1, θ2), not four angles, and I am unsure how this effects my final solution. The application of this system is that it arises in the study of arrays of Josephson junctions. Beyond that, I am not exactly sure.
 
MellyC said:
I had some questions regarding your solution.

First of all, for the solution [tex]\sin \theta_{1} = ( -\frac{\Omega}{2} ) \pm [ \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex], should it not be [tex]\sin \theta_{1} = ( -\frac{\Omega}{2} ) \pm 1/2[ \sqrt{ 4 - \Omega^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \Theta_{1} ) ] ,[/tex]? Or if not, where did the 1/2 go?

Sorry, yes, the 1/2 should be there (it got lost in all the other TeXing I was doing).

Additionally, in the same solution, I am a bit confused regarding the presence of both θ1 and Θ1. I expected to only have two angles (θ1, θ2), not four angles, and I am unsure how this effects my final solution.

The "lower-case" [itex]\theta_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\theta_{2}[/itex] are the variables. I am taking it from your problem statement that each is in the interval [itex][ 0, 2\pi )[/itex] , so what I am describing is a phase plot of [itex]\dot{\theta_{2}}[/itex] versus [itex]\dot{\theta_{1}}[/itex] over one period of each. Thus, there is a square [itex][ 0, 2\pi ) \times [ 0, 2\pi ).[/itex] (This could, of course, be repeated endlessly over the phase plane.)

The angles [itex]\Theta_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\Theta_{2}[/itex] are the two solutions to the equations [itex]\sin \theta = -\frac{\Omega}{2}[/itex] for the critical points . ( So, for [itex]\Omega = \sqrt{3}[/itex], we would have [itex]\Theta_{1} = \frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex] and [itex]\Theta_{2} = \frac{5\pi}{3}[/itex]. ) The four critical points in the phase plane are then [itex]( \Theta_{1} , \Theta_{1} ) , ( \Theta_{1} , \Theta_{2} ) , ( \Theta_{2} , \Theta_{1} ) ,[/itex] and [itex]( \Theta_{2} , \Theta_{2} ) .[/itex] It is these points about which we are constructing the linearizations.

Because [itex]\Theta_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\Theta_{2}[/itex] are in different "quadrants", their cosine values differ. For the example I gave here, with [itex]\Omega = \sqrt{3}[/itex],

[tex]\sin \theta_{1,2} = ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) - \frac{1}{2}[ \sqrt{ 4 - (\sqrt{3})^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1,2} - \frac{4\pi}{3} ) ] = ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) - [ \frac{1}{2} \cdot ( \theta_{1,2} - \frac{4\pi}{3} ) ][/tex] near [itex]\Theta_{1} = \frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex] and

[tex]\sin \theta_{1,2} = ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) + \frac{1}{2}[ \sqrt{ 4 - (\sqrt{3})^{2} } \cdot ( \theta_{1,2} - \frac{5\pi}{3} ) ] = ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) + [ \frac{1}{2} \cdot ( \theta_{1,2} - \frac{5\pi}{3} ) ][/tex] near [itex]\Theta_{2} = \frac{5\pi}{3} .[/itex]Just as an example of the linearization of one of the differential equations at a critical point, near [itex]( \Theta_{1} , \Theta_{2} ) = ( \frac{4\pi}{3} , \frac{5\pi}{3} ) ,[/itex] we have

[tex]\dot{\theta_{1}}= \Omega + \frac{3}{2} \sin \theta_{1} + \frac{1}{2}\sin \theta_{2} = \sqrt{3} + \frac{3}{2} [ ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) - [ \frac{1}{2} \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \frac{4\pi}{3} ) ] ] + \frac{1}{2} [ ( -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} ) + [ \frac{1}{2} \cdot ( \theta_{2} - \frac{5\pi}{3} ) ] ][/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{3} - \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{4} - [ \frac{3}{4} \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \frac{4\pi}{3} ) ] - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} + [ \frac{1}{4} \cdot ( \theta_{2} - \frac{5\pi}{3} )] = [ -\frac{3}{4} \cdot ( \theta_{1} - \frac{4\pi}{3} ) ] + [ \frac{1}{4} \cdot ( \theta_{2} - \frac{5\pi}{3} )] .[/tex]

There would be a similar linearization for [itex]\dot{\theta_{2}}[/itex].

You would have to do this for each of the four critical points, but happily, they are have the same form. To classify a critical point, you can substitute [itex]u = \theta_{1} - \frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex] and [itex]v = \theta_{2} - \frac{5\pi}{3}[/itex] (which give [itex]\dot{\theta_{1}} = \dot{u}[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\theta_{2}} = \dot{v}[/itex]) , so that the linearization near [itex]( \Theta_{1} , \Theta_{2} ) = ( \frac{4\pi}{3} , \frac{5\pi}{3} )[/itex] has [itex]\dot{u} = -\frac{3}{4} \cdot u + \frac{1}{4} \cdot v[/itex] and a similar result for [itex]\dot{v}[/itex].

So it looks like a lot of work for the classification, but I think the cancellations all work the same way for the pair of differential equations near each of the four points.
 
Hello,

How do you get sinθ1=(−Ω2)±1/2[srt(4−Ω2)(θ1−Θ1)] as a solution. Is the solution for sinθ2=(−Ω1)±1/2[srt(4−Ω1)(θ2−Θ2)]?

Also what happens when Ω=2?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K