Linearizing tunnel diode equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rjspurling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode Linearizing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The linearization of the tunnel diode equation, I = D * V * exp(-V/B), can be achieved by taking the natural logarithm of both sides. This results in the equation Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B, which allows for the determination of constants D and B. By graphing Ln(I/V) against V, the y-intercept corresponds to Ln(D) and the slope is -1/B. Utilizing Excel for this analysis will facilitate the calculation of the constants from the experimental data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the tunnel diode characteristics
  • Proficiency in using Excel for data analysis and graphing
  • Knowledge of linear regression techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to perform linear regression in Excel
  • Study the properties of tunnel diodes and their equations
  • Explore advanced graphing techniques in Excel
  • Investigate the significance of constants in diode equations
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, physicists studying semiconductor devices, and anyone involved in experimental data analysis of tunnel diodes.

rjspurling
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

I is the current
V is the voltage
D is a constant
B is a constant

Data was collected in an experiment designed to investigate the characteristics of a tunnel diode. I didn't do the experiment myself, I just have to find the linearized form of eq(1) and determine the constants D and B. I have a set of I values and a set of V values given to me to allow me to calculate the constants.

Homework Equations


I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am having is the V term before the exponential term.

Taking logs of both sides,
Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B
eq(2)​

I'm going to use excel to determine B and D. I'm just not sure how to graph it. If there was no V term before the exponential term then it would be,

Ln(I) = Ln(D) - V/B
eq(3)​

and i could simply graph Ln(I) vs V, and 1/B would be my gradient and Ln(D) would be my y-intercept. I can't do this for eq(2) though because of the Ln(V) term.

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi rjspurling! Welcome to PF! :smile:
rjspurling said:
Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Stop trying to keep I and V separate …

you're allowed to mix-and-match! :wink:

Hint: you want an equation with B on the LHS, and a fraction on the RHS. :smile:
 
argh mixing, of course!

Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B

Ln(I) - Ln(V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) vs V

Ln(D) is the y-intercept.

-1/B is the gradient.

I think that's it.

Thanks tiny-tim! much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K