Linearizing tunnel diode equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rjspurling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode Linearizing
AI Thread Summary
To linearize the tunnel diode equation I = D.V.exp(-V/B), the logarithmic transformation leads to Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B. The challenge arises from the V term preceding the exponential, making it difficult to graph directly. By rearranging the equation to Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B, the relationship can be plotted as Ln(I/V) against V. This allows for the determination of constants D and B, with Ln(D) as the y-intercept and -1/B as the gradient. The discussion emphasizes the importance of combining variables for effective graphing.
rjspurling
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

I is the current
V is the voltage
D is a constant
B is a constant

Data was collected in an experiment designed to investigate the characteristics of a tunnel diode. I didn't do the experiment myself, I just have to find the linearized form of eq(1) and determine the constants D and B. I have a set of I values and a set of V values given to me to allow me to calculate the constants.

Homework Equations


I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am having is the V term before the exponential term.

Taking logs of both sides,
Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B
eq(2)​

I'm going to use excel to determine B and D. I'm just not sure how to graph it. If there was no V term before the exponential term then it would be,

Ln(I) = Ln(D) - V/B
eq(3)​

and i could simply graph Ln(I) vs V, and 1/B would be my gradient and Ln(D) would be my y-intercept. I can't do this for eq(2) though because of the Ln(V) term.

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi rjspurling! Welcome to PF! :smile:
rjspurling said:
Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Stop trying to keep I and V separate …

you're allowed to mix-and-match! :wink:

Hint: you want an equation with B on the LHS, and a fraction on the RHS. :smile:
 
argh mixing, of course!

Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B

Ln(I) - Ln(V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) vs V

Ln(D) is the y-intercept.

-1/B is the gradient.

I think that's it.

Thanks tiny-tim! much appreciated.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top