Lippmann schwinger Equation, derivation

  • Thread starter Thread starter malawi_glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,432
\langle \mathbf{x} \vert \dfrac{1}{E- H_{0} \pm \varepsilon} \vert \mathbf{x'} \rangle =

\int d^{3}p' \int d^{3}p'' \langle \mathbf{x} \vert \mathbf{p'} \rangle \mathbf{p'} \vert \dfrac{1}{E- H_{0} \pm i\varepsilon} \vert \mathbf{p''} \rangle \langle \mathbf{p''} \vert \mathbf{x'} \rangle

Operator, acts to the left in this case.
H_0 = \dfrac{\mathbf{p}}{2m}

Evaluating the parts in the integral:

\langle \mathbf{p'} \vert \dfrac{1}{E- H_{0} \pm \varepsilon} \vert \mathbf{p''} \rangle =


\dfrac{\delta ^{(3)} (\mathbf{p'} - \mathbf{p''} )}{E- \frac{\mathbf{p'}}{2m} \pm i\varepsilon}


\langle \mathbf{x} \vert \mathbf{p'} \rangle = \dfrac{e^{i\mathbf{x}\mathbf{p'}}}{(2 \pi \hbar)^{3/2}}


\langle \mathbf{p''} \vert \mathbf{x'} \rangle = \dfrac{e^{-i\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{p''}}}{(2 \pi \hbar)^{3/2}} (1)

Now this last line is wrong (?), it should be:
\langle \mathbf{p''} \vert \mathbf{x'} \rangle = \dfrac{e^{-i\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{p'}}}{(2 \pi \hbar)^{3/2}} (2)
According to Sakurai p381, eq (7.1.14)

the integral should become this one when integrating with respect to p''

\int d^{3}p' \dfrac{e^{i \mathbf{p'}( \mathbf{x}- \mathbf{x'})}}{E- \frac{ \mathbf{p'}}{2m} \pm i\varepsilon} (3)

If would have continue with my expression for <p''|x'> (1)

\int d^{3}p&#039;&#039; \delta ^{(3)}( \mathbf{p&#039;} - \mathbf{p&#039;&#039;}) e^{-i\mathbf{x&#039;}\mathbf{p&#039;&#039;}}<br /> = e^{-i \mathbf{x&#039;} \mathbf{p&#039;}} (4)

Which yields the same result?

Can someone please give some Ideas on this one.

I am unsure if my expression for <p''|x'> is right, and if it is right, if I get the final result (3), and i (4) is right too.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope, the eq (1) is not wrong and yes, you get the right result after an integration wrt p". So equation (3) is the right one and it follows after using (4) , (1), and the matrix element involving delta.

And of course (4) is right as well, since it's a simple integration using the delta functional.

(2) is wrong and (1) is correct. If you've seen (2) in Sakurai, it must be a typo.
 
Last edited:
Thanx alot, and alos thanks a lot for your quick answer!

But you are telling me that both (1) and (2) is right, how come? This part I do not understand.. =/
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top