Chemistry Liquid Chlorine-Inter and Intra Molecular Forces

AI Thread Summary
Liquid chlorine consists of Cl2 molecules held together by covalent bonds within each molecule, while intermolecular forces are primarily London dispersion forces. The discussion highlights the general nature of the question, indicating that it may pertain to various chemistry concepts, including general and statistical chemistry. It emphasizes that liquid chlorine lacks more complex interactions like hydrogen bonding, which are not applicable here. The primary focus is on understanding how chlorine atoms bond and the nature of their molecular interactions. Overall, the bonding in liquid chlorine is characterized by covalent bonding within molecules and London dispersion forces between them.
mikeira
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is the question I was given:

"Describe the bonding within and between the molecules in liquid chlorine."

I suppose the obvious problem is, I have no idea what the answer is.
Any help will be appreciated! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What sort of class is it? What kinds of bonds and forces have you studied?

The reason I ask is because the question is incredibly general. The answer could be general chemistry forces, statistical chemistry type forces, or quantum type forces. Molecular dynamics also comes to mind. So...more details?
 
Higher level (IB) chemistry... That was pretty much the whole question, though. It is for an exam review, and there are no further details besides that one line.
 
Then it probably just wants you to understand hose Chlorine atoms bind together in a liquid (what sort of bond is this?) and how the molecules interact with each other (I believe these are called Van der Waals forces). There may be some other special interactions (such as hydrogen bonding in water), but I think for chlorine it's pretty simple.
 
i think the basic three types are hydrogen bonding (F,O,or N bonded to H), dipole-dipole attractions (polar molecules), and london dispersion forces (ALL attractions contain this no matter what)
the only one i think that liquid chlorine would have is the london
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top