Liquid-Liquid Extraction: Effect on Benzophenone Recovery Rate

  • Thread starter Thread starter gingerelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extraction
AI Thread Summary
Leaving some aqueous NaOH layer in the conical tube during the separation of ether solution can lead to an inaccurate recovery rate of benzophenone. The presence of water after evaporating the ether would artificially increase the mass of the recovered compound, making the recovery rate appear higher than it truly is. Additionally, some benzophenone may have transferred into the aqueous layer, further reducing the actual recovery. Impurities could also affect the recovery, as they might evaporate with the ether. Overall, these factors can significantly impact the accuracy of the benzophenone recovery assessment.
gingerelle
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If, in the separation of ether solution from aqueous NaOH layer, som eof the aqueous layer was left behind in the conical tube with the ether solution, how would the experimental value of benzophenone (the compound in the ether solution that is being isolatey) recovery be affected? Explain


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So...my guess is that when with water in the tube, after you evapourate all the ether, you're still going to have water with your benzophenone. As a result, the mass of your overall "recovered" compound would be greater than it should be. ...if this was the case, your recovery rate will seem greater, even though it is actually lower.

Is this correct, and are there any other factors that I missed?

As well, another question: what can account for a low recovery percent of benzophenone (neutral component) when the starting mixture contained a carboxylic acid and benzophenone?

perhaps..some of the benzophenone was mixed into the other layer (aqueous one) that was put into another test tube?
uh...

also...impurities that were originally present may have been evapourated out with the ether..?

I don't know if that is possible..please confirm..or reject. thanks..and any other factors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gingerelle said:
So...my guess is that when with water in the tube, after you evapourate all the ether, you're still going to have water with your benzophenone. As a result, the mass of your overall "recovered" compound would be greater than it should be. ...if this was the case, your recovery rate will seem greater, even though it is actually lower.

This part seems OK to me.
 
What else is in the water layer?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top