Locally bounded linear differential operators

greentea28a
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The following is a problem statement.

locally bounded (or locally (weakly) compact) differential operators of the Schwartz space of smooth functions on a sigma-compact manifold

I realize this is very abstract. I expect the solution to be just as abstract.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's not a question, and we're not in the habit of doing people's work for them anyway. What is the problem you're working on, and what have you done so far?
 
I believe the above problem is the core of the Navier-Stokes equation. It describes the inner working of the NS equations from a mathematical operator's point-of-view.

I have studied bornology from Hogbe-Nlend's books Bornology and Functional Analysis; Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces. According to Wikipedia, bornology is the minimum amount of structure to address boundedness of sets and functions.

The next closest thing I have come across is Nuclear Convex Bornological Spaces.
 
Last edited:
greentea28a said:
I believe the above problem is the core of the Navier-Stokes equation.

What problem? You just said a kind of operator. It would be like me starting a thread and saying "bounded linear function". What are you trying to prove?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top