Locally Maximally Symmetric Spacetimes

HomerSimpson
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can one say that every general curved spacetime, locally is maximally symmetric?
I know that one can say that every general curved spacetime is locally flat (and therefore maximally symmetric with R=0), but I'm talking about a very high curvature spacetime, where still we can consider nonzero curvatures.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HomerSimpson said:
Can one say that every general curved spacetime, locally is maximally symmetric?

What do you mean by "maximally symmetric"? Most general curved spacetimes have no symmetries at all (i.e., no Killing vector fields).

HomerSimpson said:
I know that one can say that every general curved spacetime is locally flat (and therefore maximally symmetric with R=0)

No, you can't say that. What you can say is that every general curved spacetime is locally Lorentz, meaning that at a given event, you can choose a coordinate chart that makes ##g_{ab} = \eta_{ab}## at that event, and makes all of the connection coefficients (first derivatives of ##g_{ab}##) vanish at that event. But that doesn't make ##R = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for you replay Peter, but I'm still a little bit confused.

PeterDonis said:
What do you mean by "maximally symmetric"? Most general curved spacetimes have no symmetries at all (i.e., no Killing vector fields).

I know it, but I meant "locally" not globally.


PeterDonis said:
No, you can't say that. What you can say is that every general curved spacetime is locally Lorentz, meaning that at a given event, you can choose a coordinate chart that makes ##g_{ab} = \eta_{ab}## at that event, and makes all of the connection coefficients (first derivatives of ##g_{ab}##) vanish at that event. But that doesn't make ##R = 0##.

What you mention here, looks like the Riemann normal coordinate, is it?

PeterDonis said:
But that doesn't make ##R = 0##.

Can we assume that R is almost constant as in maximally symmetric spacetimes and therefore R_{ab}\propto Rg_{ab}?


What I get from your answer, is we can not say that a general high curved spacetime, is "locally" maximally symmetric. Am I right?
 
HomerSimpson said:
What I get from your answer, is we can not say that a general high curved spacetime, is "locally" maximally symmetric. Am I right?
That's right. And you can strike the word "high". A general curved spacetime is not locally maximally symmetric.

Since the Riemann tensor has dimension L-2, curvature only sets a length scale, and you can only say it's large or small in comparison to some other length.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top