Using a Lock-in Amplifier for Strain Gage Measurement: Tips and Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter rutman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplifier Lock
AI Thread Summary
Using a lock-in amplifier (LIA) for strain gauge measurement requires careful setup to avoid overload and maximize sensitivity. The user is experiencing issues with reading small changes in a 5mV signal due to noise, leading to overload when adjusting sensitivity. It is essential to balance the Wheatstone bridge to achieve a 0V average output before amplification. Properly zeroing the signal and adjusting the LIA phase are crucial steps to ensure accurate measurements. Balancing the bridge and amplifying the signal at the desired level will improve the ability to detect small weight changes effectively.
rutman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi
i am using a lockin amplifier for the 1st time other than a canned college lab demo.
i have a 5mV signal from a strain gage that is driven with 10Vpp at 1kHz or whatever i choose.
the 5mV is increased to 5.01mV when i add some weight to the arm the
gage is weighing.
i wanted to increase sensitivity of this reading with the LIA since there is noise in the next digit, i.e.
i read 5.01mV +- 0.01mV.

But i seem to go out of range (overload) before reading any weight change.
do i need to get a 0V average signal first, and put this into
the LIA?

the 4 strain gages are in a full wheatstone bridge configuration.
The 10V 1kHz signal is sent to the bridge and to the LIA 'reference' input,
5mV 1kHz bridge output sent to to LIA signal in. I adjust the LIA phase for max output,
zero the signal with the internal LIA offset, and increase sensitivity until i overload.
then i back off the sensitivity so there's no overload. at this point i see no change in output
with change in weight. the LIA sensitivity is generally 30mV at this point, whereas
the signal I want to measure is 0.01mV or less, so it seems natural i won't get a change in
output. the only thing i can think of is i must 'balance the bridge' to get 0.00V output, and
amplify this to higher levels e.g. at the 0.01mV level.
is this right?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Absolutely correct.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Back
Top