Locus of points making an ellipse

  • Thread starter Thread starter fireflies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse Points
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the properties of ellipses, particularly how the locus of points that maintains a constant sum of distances from two fixed points (foci) defines an ellipse. The user explores the mathematical derivation of the ellipse equation using specific foci and the Pythagorean theorem, leading to some confusion over the calculations. They initially struggle with the relationship between eccentricity and the ellipse's dimensions but ultimately find that their calculations are consistent. The conversation highlights the challenge of understanding how any point on the ellipse also satisfies the constant distance property, prompting a reflection on the historical discovery of these properties. The user concludes by acknowledging the validity of their findings and expresses interest in further exploration of the topic.
fireflies
Messages
210
Reaction score
12
I know that

1) when eccentricity is less than 1 then it is an ellipse

2) locus of points making sum of the distance from two fixed points(foci) with that point a constant, creates ellipse.

Here comes the question, I understand that locus made according to number 2, is ellipsoidal. But how can it give the same equation of an ellipse? Or in reverse way how the sum of the distance of any point on the ellipse from the foci is constant?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You might be able to derive the equation for an ellipse for a specific example.

Start with foci at (-3,0) and (3,0) and then use the pythagorean theorem to get the distance from point on the ellipse and the two foci then add them together. Next do it again using a point (x,y).
 
I tried it. I considered a normal ellipse with an equation

(x^2/a^2)+(y^2/b^2)=1 and a>b

taking eccentricity e, foci comes (ae,0) and (-ae,0). On, (0,b) applying Pythagorus' theorem I got

(ae)^2 + b^2 = s^2

again at vertex (a,0) there is

2S=2a+ae
or, S= a+ ae/2
or, S^2=a^2 +a^2e + (ae/2)^2

Well, then I did quite different thing. I put the two values of s^2 together to get that if the equation is correct.

That brought

a^2 + a^2e + (ae/2)^2 = a^2 (e^2 + (b/a)^2)

or, 1+ e + e^2/4 = 1 - (b/a)^2 + (b/a)^2

or, e + e/4= O

But it cannot be. There must be some problem in calculation. And I don't know how else to solve it
 
fireflies said:
I tried it. I considered a normal ellipse with an equation

(x^2/a^2)+(y^2/b^2)=1 and a>b

taking eccentricity e, foci comes (ae,0) and (-ae,0). On, (0,b) applying Pythagorus' theorem I got

(ae)^2 + b^2 = s^2

again at vertex (a,0) there is

2S=2a+ae {I get 2s=(a+ae)+(a-ae)=2s}
or, S= a+ ae/2
or, S^2=a^2 +a^2e + (ae/2)^2

Well, then I did quite different thing. I put the two values of s^2 together to get that if the equation is correct.

That brought

a^2 + a^2e + (ae/2)^2 = a^2 (e^2 + (b/a)^2)

or, 1+ e + e^2/4 = 1 - (b/a)^2 + (b/a)^2 {where did -(b/a)^2 come from?}

or, e + e/4= O

But it cannot be. There must be some problem in calculation. And I don't know how else to solve it

My comments in text using {}.
 
e^2= 1-(b/a)^2

when a>b
 
Oh yes, s=a then, 2s = 2a.

so, a^2=a^2(e^2+(b/a)^2)

which brings 1=1.

So, the calculation is true.

I got the solution.

But how can we possibly come to conclusion that any other point P(x,y) also give the same 2S=2a?

Should I try finding out for any such point, or, is there an easy conclusion from the upper two cases?

How did anyone who first found it out do it then?
 
Here 2S means S+S' (one from each focus)
 
jedishrfu said:
Here's an interesting discussion on ellipses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipse
Yes, I've found the whole proof from the page giving another link.

(The link is: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_involving_the_ellipse )Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Back
Top