Loeb's perspective on emergence of structure

AI Thread Summary
Abraham Loeb's review paper discusses how complex structures like stars and galaxies emerged from the simple initial conditions of the universe through gravitational processes. He emphasizes the need for advanced telescopes to observe the transition from simplicity to complexity, which remains unobserved. The paper highlights the significance of cosmological redshift in understanding the universe's expansion and calculating distances and ages of galaxies. There is a debate regarding the interpretation of general relativity and its impact on photon frequency during this expansion. The discussion underscores the ongoing challenges and frontiers in cosmology related to the early universe's structure.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
This is an invited review paper by a worldclass authority, so it could be useful.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2258
Let there be Light: the Emergence of Structure out of the Dark Ages in the Early Universe
Abraham Loeb (Harvard)
32 pages, 18 figures, an invited review for the UNESCO EOLSS Encyclopedia
(Submitted on 14 Apr 2008)

"The initial conditions of our Universe can be summarized on a single sheet of paper. Yet the Universe is full of complex structures today, such as stars, galaxies and groups of galaxies. In this review I describe the standard theoretical model for how complexity emerged from the simple initial state of the Universe at early cosmic times through the action of gravity. In order to test and inform the related theoretical calculations, large-aperture telescopes and arrays of radio antennae are currently being designed and constructed. The actual transition from simplicity to complexity has not been observed as of yet. The simple initial conditions were already traced in maps of the microwave background radiation, but the challenge of detecting the first generation of galaxies defines one of the exciting frontiers in the future of cosmology. Once at hand, the missing images of the infant Universe might potentially surprise us and revise our current ideas."
 
Space news on Phys.org
I think Loeb has done an admirable job assembling a state of the universe presentation. He captures the open issues well, IMO.
 
"As the universe expands, photon wavelengths get stretched as well. The factor by which the observed wavelength is increased (i.e. shifted towards the red) relative to the emitted one is denoted by (1+z), where z is the cosmological redshift. Astronomers use the known emission patterns of hydrogen and other chemical elements in the spectrum of each galaxy to measure z. This then implies that the universe has expanded by a factor of (1 + z) in linear dimension since the galaxy emitted the observed light, and cosmologists can calculate the corresponding distance and cosmic age for the source galaxy."

I do not agree with that at all, where does general relativity demonstrate that the frequency of photons along the path between emission and absorption is modified by spacetime curvature?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top