LOGIC proving/disproving general laws

dburton
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
One of the following general laws is true, the other false. Prove the true one. Find a counter example to the other.(We must do this in writing out each statement, no truth tables or anything.

(a) If X implies Y, then the disjunction of X or Y is equivalent to X.
(b) If X implies Y, then the disjunction of X or Y is equivalent to Y.

I don't know, could you help me write out each step to prove/disprove?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dburton said:
One of the following general laws is true, the other false. Prove the true one. Find a counter example to the other.(We must do this in writing out each statement, no truth tables or anything.

(a) If X implies Y, then the disjunction of X or Y is equivalent to X.
(b) If X implies Y, then the disjunction of X or Y is equivalent to Y.

I don't know, could you help me write out each step to prove/disprove?

Okey. We have as an assumption "X implies Y". That means that either (1) X is false and Y is false, (2) X is false and Y is true, or (3) X is true and Y is true (because "X implies Y" is false if and only if X is true and Y is false). "[T]he disjunction of X or Y" (this is phrased a little funny) is false for (1) and true for (2) and (3). So we need to figure out if X or Y is similarly false for (1) and true for (2) and (3). That will be your answer. We see that Y satisfies these criteria, so (b) is the correct answer. A counterexample to (a) is the case where X is false and Y is true. Then "X implies Y" is true, but "the disjunction of X or Y" (true) is not equivalent to X (false).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top