Logic Puzzle: Is 0=1 When ∞=1/0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ojsimon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical implications of treating infinity as a number, specifically questioning the validity of the equation 0=1 derived from the expression ∞=1/0. Participants clarify that division by zero is undefined and that infinity is not a conventional number, making arithmetic operations involving it problematic. They explain that while some mathematical frameworks, like the extended reals or projective reals, include concepts of infinity, operations like 1/0 and 0*∞ remain undefined. The conversation emphasizes that any hypothetical number system allowing such operations would lead to contradictions, such as proving 0=1. Ultimately, the consensus is that the original logic contains errors due to misunderstandings about the nature of infinity in mathematics.
ojsimon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
∞=1/0

so: 0* ∞=1

so: 0=1


Why is this, or have i made a mistake somewhere in my logic?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Division by zero is undefined.
 
Also, infinity is not an entity upon which you can do arithmetic.
 
ojsimon said:
Why is this, or have i made a mistake somewhere in my logic?
You probably have made a mistake. Have you learned any arithmetic systems that include a number called ∞? If not, then you made a mistake simply by writing ∞.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Also, infinity is not an entity upon which you can do arithmetic.
If by "infinity" you mean "a vague and undefined notion that you don't really know anything about", then you're certainly correct.


But there are arithmetic structures that do include an object / some objects called infinity, and you can do arithmetic there. e.g. in elementary calculus you (implicitly) learn about one such number system: the extended reals.



Of course, in the extended reals, 1/0 is undefined, as is 0*(+∞).

And even in the projective reals where 1/0=∞, 0*∞ is still undefined.
 
Hurkyl said:
You probably have made a mistake. Have you learned any arithmetic systems that include a number called ∞? If not, then you made a mistake simply by writing ∞.
Just to expand on this...

In mathematics (and other disciplines) we might speculate -- we might consider "if we had a number system with something called ∞, how might that work out?"

And as your calculation shows, if we had such a number system with the properties that 1/0=∞, division has the property that a/b=c implies a=bc, and multiplication has the property that 0*x=0, then the number system couldn't be very useful because we could prove that 0=1.

But the calculation in this hypothetical number system says nothing about the real numbers (or the complex numbers, or the integers, or the extended real numbers or anything else). And it tells us that if we want a number system that contains ∞, we shouldn't insist on all of the properties we used in the above calculation.
 
There is a number system (the Riemann sphere) that has an element \infty.
But even there, the product 0\cdot\infty is undefined.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top