Long wire problem: Deriving an expression from the Bessel Function

fuzzeleven
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A straight wire clamped vertically at its lower end stands vertically if it is short, but bends under its own weight if it is long. It can be shown that the greatest length for vertical equilibrium is l, where kl(3/2) is the first zero of J-1/3 and k=4/3r2*√(ρg/∏Y) where r is the radius, ρ is the linear density, g is the acceleration of gravity, and Y is the Young modulus. Find l for a steel wire of radius 1 mm; for a lead wire of the same radius.


What I've done so far is plug -1/3 in for p to simplify the Bessel function, and then set that equal to zero. What I really am interested in is how to derive the expression with the Bessel function, but I really don't know where to start. Any suggestions on how to tackle this? Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to a calculator I found on-line, the first zero of J-1/3 = 1.866350858873895. So
1.866350858873895 = kl3/2
You know the other parameters so just solve for l.

PS - I can't vouch for the calculator. It's at http://cose.math.bas.bg/webMathematica/webComputing/BesselZeros.jsp

I suppose in a way that's cheating but that's what you'd do in real life - use all available data. I don't know of an equation that would yield the zeros explicitly.

I don't understand what you tried to do, why you did it, and what is p?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For the zeroes, you might try the Handbook of Mathematical Functions by Abramowitz and Stegun. The have polynomial respresentations for Bessel functions that are good to 8 or 9 significant figures over designated ranges. You can find the zeroes of the polynomials by Newton's method or other root finding methodology. I cannot look in the book because I no longer have access to a copy but have used their polynomials to represent products of Bessel functions (orthogonality considerations) with good accuracy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top