Look for a value of delta limit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the limit of the function (2x - 1)/(x + 1) as x approaches 2 and verifying it using an ε-δ argument. The limit is determined to be 1, but the user struggles with establishing a suitable delta (δ) that satisfies the ε condition. They attempt to manipulate inequalities but encounter issues with their approach, particularly regarding the validity of their steps and the application of the triangle inequality. Guidance is provided to reconsider the inequalities and the relationship between the numerator and denominator to find a correct δ. The user expresses gratitude and plans to reattempt the problem with the new insights.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hello, could someone please help me out with the following question?

Q. Find the limit \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \left( {\frac{{2x - 1}}{{x + 1}}} \right) and verify the result by \varepsilon - \delta argument.

I got the limit as 1 so I began to look for a value of delta.

Required: \left| {\frac{{2x - 1}}{{x + 1}} - 1} \right| < \varepsilon whenever 0 < \left| {x - 2} \right| < \delta.

\left| {\frac{{x - 2}}{{x + 1}}} \right| < \varepsilon whenever 0 < \left| {x - 2} \right| < \delta.

I get stuck at this point. Even after I use division on the LHS I still don't get anywhere. Perhaps I need to consider values of x near 2 and deduce something from that? I dunno. Could someone please help me out? Any help would be great thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that |x - 2| = |x + 1 - 3| <= |x + 1| + |-3| <=> |x - 2| - 3 <= |x + 1| by the Triangle Inequality.

--J
 
Thanks for your help so far. Using the inequality I get:

<br /> \left| {\frac{{x + 2}}{{x + 1}}} \right| \le \frac{{\left| {x + 2} \right|}}{{\left| {x + 2} \right| - 3}} \le \left| {x + 2} \right|<br />

I then choose delta = epsilon. Is that step valid?
 
No. I lead you a bit astray, actually. You'll note that your step is not valid, at, for instance, x = 1.1.

Also, if you're making your denominator larger, it's actually making the total smaller, so the <= sign is not preserved by the first substitution.

You'll find the other end of the triangle inequality much more useful.

|x - 2| = |x + 1 - 3| >= |x + 1| - |-3| <=> |x + 1| <= |x - 2| + 3.

Sorry about that.

--J
 
Last edited:
Ok thanks for the help. I'll give it another try.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top