Look of trajectory of a material point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the trajectory of a body moving in a three-dimensional space, defined by the parametric equations x(t)=At², y(t)=Bt, and z(t)=0. The focus is on understanding the shape of the trajectory in the x-y plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the trajectory's representation in the x-y plane and consider plotting points or converting parametric equations to a standard form. There is speculation about the trajectory resembling a logarithmic function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested sketching the trajectory or finding y as a function of x to clarify its shape. There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between the variables, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that z(t)=0 confines the motion to the x-y plane, and there is a focus on deriving the relationship between x and y from the given parametric equations.

Chemist@
Messages
115
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A body is moving, with the following data (these are all dependencies of the radius vector components respective to time): x(t)=At2, A>0; y(t)=Bt, B>0, z(t)=0. How does the trajectory of this movement look?

Homework Equations


r=x(t)i+y(t)j+z(t)k
Velocity=dr/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


r=At2*i+Bt*j (i,j and r are vectors)
Velocity=2At*i+B*j
Intuitively I think that the trajectory would look like a logarithm function, but is it correct and how to prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since z(t)=0 for all t the trajectory must lie entirely in the x-y plane. Did you try to sketch the trajectory? Pick arbitrary values for A and B and plot a few points. Alternatively, find y as a function of x and comment on the type of function it represents.
 
You may know already a type of motion which satisfies similar conditions.
 
I thought that it would look similar to y=log(x). Correct?
 
Chemist@ said:
I thought that it would look similar to y=log(x). Correct?
Similar it may be, but you can find the actual equation by converting from parametric form to standard y(x) = ... form.
 
Is it y=B*sqrt(x/A)?
 
Chemist@ said:
Is it y=B*sqrt(x/A)?
Yup. Or if you combine the constants, ##y = c\sqrt{x}## .
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K