MHB Looking for a place to get what things equal

  • Thread starter Thread starter schinb65
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of probability formulas relevant to an actuary exam. The user seeks clarification on the equivalence of expressions involving probabilities, specifically $Pr(a \cap h^c)$ and $Pr(a \cap 1-h)$. It is established that $Pr(a \cap h^c)$ can be expressed as $Pr(a) - Pr(a \cap h)$, leading to the conclusion that $Pr(a \cap 1-h)$ is not a valid expression since "1" is not a defined set in this context. Visual aids like Venn diagrams are suggested for better understanding the relationships between these probabilities. The conversation emphasizes the need for clear definitions and proper notation in probability theory.
schinb65
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am studying for an actuary exam. It has been years since I took a Stats/probability class. I am not really sure where I can find formulas that are the same.

I have this $Pr(a\cap h^c)$, so i believe that I can say $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ is that true?

The solution has this:
$Pr((a\cap h^c)$ = $(a-h)$ = $(a-(a \cap h))$

So, if what I have is true, how can I go for $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ to $(a-(a \cap h))$?

I was kind of hoping in the solution can be explained, or if any links where I would be able to see that the solution works as well as others so that I can review what I have forgotten over the years.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
schinb65 said:
I am studying for an actuary exam. It has been years since I took a Stats/probability class. I am not really sure where I can find formulas that are the same.

I have this $Pr(a\cap h^c)$, so i believe that I can say $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ is that true?

The solution has this:
$Pr((a\cap h^c)$ = $(a-h)$ = $(a-(a \cap h))$

So, if what I have is true, how can I go for $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ to $(a-(a \cap h))$?

I was kind of hoping in the solution can be explained, or if any links where I would be able to see that the solution works as well as others so that I can review what I have forgotten over the years.

Thank you.

I think I got it, I can say this correct?
$Pr(A)= Pr(A\cap H) + Pr(a\cap H^c)$
Thus if I use algebra I can work it around to get $Pr(A)-Pr(A \cap H)=Pr((A\cap H^c)$
 
schinb65 said:
I am studying for an actuary exam. It has been years since I took a Stats/probability class. I am not really sure where I can find formulas that are the same.

I have this $Pr(a\cap h^c)$, so i believe that I can say $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ is that true?

The solution has this:
$Pr((a\cap h^c)$ = $(a-h)$ = $(a-(a \cap h))$

So, if what I have is true, how can I go for $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ to $(a-(a \cap h))$?

I was kind of hoping in the solution can be explained, or if any links where I would be able to see that the solution works as well as others so that I can review what I have forgotten over the years.

Thank you.

I will show
a \cap h^c = a - h
first you have to know what
a - h means all elements in "a" except the elements in h ( i.e elements in the intersection of a and h )
I will use ven diagrams in the attachment, the red circle denote to h, yellow denote to a the square denote to the field or omega (Probability space)
in the first square a-h, i remove from "a" the intersection so the half moon resulted
in the second the gray area represent h^c which intersect with a at the half moon. so they are equivalent
there is another way to show that
a -h = a \cap h^c
I prefer this way, we take an element arbitrary in the left side and show that it is in the right side and take an element in the right and show it is in the left as this
let x \in a - h that means x \in a and x\notin h so x \in h^c
and hence x \in a \cap h^c
let x \in a\cap h^c
so x\in a and x\in h^c since x is in the complement of h x\notin h
this give x \in a-h

I have this $Pr(a\cap h^c)$, so i believe that I can say $Pr(a\cap 1-h)$ is that true?
it is false not true since 1 -h is not defined 1 is not a set what is true is
Pr(h) + Pr(h^c) = 1
instead h^c = \omega - h
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 62
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top