kelvin5885 said:
Hi dlgoff
Thanks for the reply!
My project revolves around utilizing the principle of laser interferometry to read tracks off vinyl records, instead of using a needle and piezoelement. I chose this project, even though I major in power engineering, because I've always been enthusiastic and passionate about sound quality, and the idea of using a laser to read analog signals is just so exciting!
Anyways, for the first step of my project, I am just trying to build a setup to read the outer track of the vinyl record,just to get some sort of result before worrying about how I can move my laser inwards. I'm going to base my set up on the Michelson set up for starters,and hopefully I can get some sort of result.
Any ideas,hints,or things I have to watch out for?
Cheers.
Kelvin
This sounds like an interesting idea. It should be a good, although probably difficult, project. I don't consider myself an expert in interferometry, but I've done some basic things like holograms and simple distance measurements with interferometers. Much of my work in this area, was based on optical fiber technology, but some of it was bulk optics based. Anyway, please share any results you get. I think this will be interesting to members here, and you will allow people to comment and help you out.
I can make some initial (very speculative) guesses as follows.
I don't know much about the properties of the vinyl used in records, but I would be worried that they are black and would tend not to reflect much light. It would be interesting to see if infrared wavelengths are better suited. There are some records that are not black, so you could track some of those down if you run into trouble. Ideally, it would be better if you could find or make a record out of a metal like gold or silver. This has a better chance of being usable in an interferometer.
Another issue is the coupling of light in the interferometer. The analog signal, via the groove depth, implies a reflective surface that is always changing its angle. This may direct the beam out of the interferometer, which might confuse the measurements. However, perhaps this effect will be too small to be an issue.
I also don't know about the depth range (modulation) of the record grooves. You will want to compare the distance excursion in the grooves with the wavelength of light you are using. If the modulation is much less than one wavelength (which i doubt), then you will have linear response, but poor sensitivity. If the modulation is comparable to the wavelength then you will have good sensitivity, but nonlinear analog response. If the modulation is much greater than the wavelength, you can count optical interference fringes in a digital fashion. This will make reception easier, but you will have a quantized (digital) encoding of the analog signal. If you can find out the typical range of distance in the grooves and post the result, perhaps I can say more.