Looking for introductory collision theory resources

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the need for supplementary resources on collision theory, specifically regarding collision cross sections, the coefficient of restitution, and impact parameters. The user is currently studying classical mechanics and finds the materials in Taylor's Classical Mechanics insufficient. They mention Goldstein as better for collision cross sections but lacking in information on the coefficient of restitution. Resnick and Halliday are suggested as a potential resource, though the user expresses uncertainty about the appropriateness of the forum for their query. Overall, the thread seeks recommendations for comprehensive introductory materials on collision theory.
lordkelvin
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in classical mechanics, and we're doing collisions and two body problems currently.

A good portion of the material is covered only in the notes. I could use some supplementary materials. I've looked around on the internet but I haven't found any good resources yet.

I was wondering if anyone could point me towards a good book or web page that covers things like the collision cross section, the coefficient of restitution, and the impact parameter.

We're using Taylor's Classical Mechanics and there isn't enough information. I've looked in Goldstein, and it covers collision cross sections much better, but there isn't enough about the coefficient of restitution.

Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Resnick and Halliday is a good book. But I am not really sure if this is a right place to post such a question.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top