Looking for reading suggestions

Minimonster
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
As the title says I'm looking for reading suggestions for complex analysis. I'm a novice at the subject and looking to do some self study to bring myself up to a graduate level of understanding. I've been looking at some reviews on Amazon on such books, but I think I would rather hear your thoughts here before I make any purchases. Thanks to all in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Visual Complex Analysis is my favorite math book of all time. Even if you're not that much of a visual thinker, the book might be worth a look because it will teach you. If you're going for graduate level, though, I would supplement it with some other book. The only other book I'm familiar with is Alfhors, which isn't bad, but I don't know if I would recommend it, since I don't have much to compare it to. There's also a free one available online by Robert Ash, I think.
 
I too really like Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham, but not alone. I like Complex Analysis by Serge Lang. You did not state how much background you have, but Lang is written to only assume elementary calculus which makes some early parts disjointed and long winded. Also An introduction to the theory of functions of a complex variable by E. T Copson.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top