Looking to build an impressive project for my college application

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on building an impressive project for a college application, with a focus on creating a particle accelerator or a nuclear fusion reactor. The user seeks a project that is interesting, cost-effective (under $600), and not overly complex or large. They express interest in alternatives like sonoluminescence devices and demo nuclear fusion reactors that produce plasma without actual fusion. There is a query about the perceived value of such projects for college applications. Overall, the user is open to ideas and is willing to design their own project if necessary.
guss
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I am currently looking to build something for fun, and to add to my college application/resume. I was thinking about building a particle accelerator, and did a good amount of research into that, and it seems like it would be expensive and complicated. However, I am still open to that idea, as I'm sure there are other types of particle accelerators that are easier and cheaper to build.

But, before I begin building, I want to be sure that I am building the best and most interesting thing. I don't want this to be super expensive to build (sub $600 is a rough estimate), and I don't want it to take ages or be very large. I am willing to design my own thing if there are not any plans on the internet, or what have you.

Also, what about 'fusers'? What is generally considered one of the easiest, and cheapest type to build (assuming the model is safe :p)?

Sorry if I sound blunt in this post, but there's really not much else to say. So, anyone have any ideas? I'm open to pretty much anything. Alternatively, some ideas for the particle accelerator and how to build it would be great.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
How about a sonoluminescence device?
 
RocketSci5KN said:
How about a sonoluminescence device?
Maybe, I just looked into it and it sounds interesting.

What about a "demo" nuclear fusion reactor? One that just creates plasma and doesn't fuse?
 
guss said:
Maybe, I just looked into it and it sounds interesting.

What about a "demo" nuclear fusion reactor? One that just creates plasma and doesn't fuse?

"www.fusor.net"[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jasongreat said:
"www.fusor.net"[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yeah, I have been looking at that.

Do you guys think that building something like a model nuclear fusor, that just produces plasma, would be impressive to colleges? Even though it would be fun to build anyway.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top