Loop-level corrections to the neutrino mass

ryanwilk
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Quick question. In the SM, why can't we have loop-level interactions that give neutrinos their small masses?
(It seems like we must also have Majorana neutrinos)Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Giving neutrinos a Dirac mass requires there to be right-handed neutrinos and giving them Majorana masses requires a source of explicit lepton number violation. The standard model has neither of these*; so, it can't generate any sort of neutrino masses.

*Well, strictly, the SM does have non-perturbative lepton number violation; but, only with a compensating violation of baryon number that leaves B-L conserved. Majorana mass requires that this be broken as well.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top