Lorentz Algebra in Boosts for the spin-1/2 Dirac Field

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.


This is the "Master commutation" rule of the Lorentz section of the Poincaré group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré_group

J^{\mu\nu} can be both a rotation generator as well as a boost generator, so this is the most
general way of defining the commutation rules between these generators.


It's far simpler to look at the individual rules like [J^i,J^i] and [K^i,K^i] or [J^i,K^i] where
J and K are the rotation and boost generators respectively.


You can find these in many books like Ryder, Weinberg (vol 1) or P&S


Regards, Hans
 
Thanks.
 
maverick280857 said:
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.

Lorentz algebra is SO(4) algebra, synonymous almost. To be exact, Lorentz algebra is SO(3,1) algebra. So you can derive the commutation relations for SO(4), and try to turn SO(4) into SO(3,1) by converting Krockner deltas into metric tensors by raising or lowering.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top