Lorentz contraction at relativistic speeds

TonyP
So I was reading up on the SR equations and the following thought experiment crossed my mind:

Suppose you have someone in a starship traveling at high enough speed to make the Lorentz factor noticeable. Will that produce a blurring effect when the observer is looking out the front window? I am not talking about motion blur here, just the regular uniform blur you get if you're myopic. This effect will of course be on top of the aberration, redshift and luminosity effects.

The eye of the observer is being contracted along the x axis, meaning that the lens gets thinner and the retina gets closer to the lens. All the while c is constant. Will the thinner lens have its diffraction index lowered and as a result light being correctily projected on the retina or not? (considering that the lens is exactly the same, just with molecules more tightly packed together - or does lorentz contraction does have nothing to do at all with space between nuclei?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have a misunderstanding of the nature of the Lorentz contraction. Let us assume A and B are going near the speed of light relative to each other. A will observe B contacting and B will observe A contracting. However neither will observe any such change within their own frame.
Your description of the eye changes in your note would be observed by an outside observer, but NOT by the person him(her)self.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top