Solving the Motion of an Electron in a Magnetic/Electrical Field

AI Thread Summary
To solve the motion of an electron in a constant magnetic field along the z-axis, the relevant force equation is F(x, x', t) = q(v × B(x, t)). This can be broken down into three scalar equations for motion, with the x-component derived as F_x = -qBv_y. By applying Newton's second law, this leads to the equation d²x/dt² = -(qB/m)(dy/dt). For an electric field directed along the y-axis, the force equation F = qE is appropriate, but it must also account for the particle's characteristics. The discussion emphasizes the need to express vector equations in scalar form for clarity in motion analysis.
Icheb
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I have a constant magnetic field pointing in the direction of the z axis and I'm supposed to find a formula for the way an electron with arbitrary starting position and velocity would travel in this field.

The formula in this case would be

F(x, x', t) = q(v × B(x, t))

and I'm stuck at the point where I have to split this formula into the three equations for motion. Would I just use

F(x, x', t) = q(x' × B(x, t))

and so on or am I missing something? And how would I proceed afterwards?Then there's also a similar problem, but with an electrical field pointing in the direction of the y axis. Which formula would I use here? The only one I can think of is F = q*E, but don't I need a formula that contains information about the particle involved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, there is no x and t dependence on B; the question says that it is constant in the z direction. Then you have to split that vector equation of yours into 3 scalar equations: one for each components. I'll do one for you since this seems to be confusing to you:

\vec{F}=q(\vec{v}\times B\hat{z})

\Leftrightarrow F_x\hat{x}+F_y\hat{y}+F_z\hat{z}=qB(v_x\hat{z}-v_y\hat{x})

Therefor, the scalar equation corresponding to the x-component is

F_x=-qBv_y

But since v_y=dy/dt and by Newton's second law, F_x=md²x/dt², that equation is equivalent to

\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-\frac{qB}{m}\frac{dy}{dt}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top