Alternate Representations of Lorentz Generators Mμν

sshaep
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know the representations of Lorentz generators M\mu\nu as 4X4 matrices.

This matrices satisfy the commutation relation(Lie algebra of O(3,1))

However I think these 4X4 matrix representations are not unique.

Is there any other representations satisfying the commutation relation? 2X2 matrix or

another?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there are infinitely many representations of the Lorentz algebra. One trivial example is to form a set of 8x8 matrices by taking the Kronecker product of M with the 2x2 identity.
 
sshaep said:
Is there any other representations satisfying the commutation relation? 2X2 matrix or another?

Because SL \left(2 , \mathbb{C} \right) is the universal cover of the restricted Lorentz group, they have isomorphic Lie algebras.
 
George Jones said:
Because SL \left(2 , \mathbb{C} \right) is the universal cover of the restricted Lorentz group, they have isomorphic Lie algebras.

This means can I get the 2x2 representation of M\mu\nu from SL(2,C)?

But how? What I know is \sigma_{\mu}A^{\mu} _{\phantom{\mu}\nu}}=L\sigma_{\nu}L^{\dagger}
 
Take

<br /> M^{0i} = \frac{i}{2} \sigma^{i}, \ \ M^{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{ijk}\sigma^{k}<br />

Also, if you define

\omega_{i0} = 2 Re(\alpha_{i}), \ \ \omega_{ij} = 2 \epsilon^{ijk} Im(\alpha_{k})

then

<br /> 1 + \frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}M^{\mu\nu} = \left( \begin {array}{rr} (1 + \alpha_{3}) &amp; (\alpha_{1} - i \alpha_{2}) \\ (\alpha_{1} + i \alpha_{2}) &amp; (1 - \alpha_{3}) \end {array} \right)<br />

represents elements of SL(2,C) infinitesimally close to the identity element.

regards

sam
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top