Lorentz Transform of Radial & Longitudinal Dependent Magnetic Field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Lorentz transformation of magnetic fields, specifically focusing on a magnetic field that depends on both radial and longitudinal distributions of particles. The participants explore the complexities involved when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the boost axis and seek literature to support their understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to Lorentz transform a magnetic field that varies with a Gaussian distribution of particles and is dependent on longitudinal distribution.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity to Lorentz transform the magnetic vector itself, referencing advanced electromagnetic theory literature.
  • A participant suggests that the transformation may become non-trivial when dealing with a longitudinally dependent radial field that is perpendicular to the boost axis.
  • Literature is recommended that discusses the Lorentz transformation for electric and magnetic fields, with a link provided for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of the Lorentz transformation in this context, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the transformation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the transformation due to the dependence on specific configurations of the fields and the boost axis, as well as the need for further literature to clarify these points.

matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
Basically I am trying to lorentz transform the magnetic field along θ of a bunch particles which have a gaussian distribution to the radial electric field. However the magnetic field in θ is dependent on the longitiudinal distribution.
Now initially i thought we would just use the standard LT,

x=x'
y=y'
s'=/gamma (s-βct).
Now someone suggested to me that infact the transform will be non trivial when a longitudinal dependent radial field is perpendicular to the boost axis.
Can someone suggest some literature that would point me in the right direction?

Just for reference the field follows as,

B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}

Sorry i am not sure how to make it latex
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to Lorentz transform the B vector also. This is described in advanced EM books.
 
matt_crouch said:
B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}

Sorry i am not sure how to make it latex
Put a double-dollar before and after
$$B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}$$
Then correct the errors
$$B_{\theta}=\mbox{Const} \times r^{-1/2}e^{-r^{2}/2 \sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}$$
...if that's what you meant.
 
matt_crouch said:
Now someone suggested to me that infact the transform will be non trivial when a longitudinal dependent radial field is perpendicular to the boost axis.
Can someone suggest some literature that would point me in the right direction?

Maybe this will help:

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node123.html

which presents the Lorentz transformation for E and B fields. To see the derivation, you have to work backwards through the preceding pages.
 
Ok thanks.. I'll have a look through
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K