Lorentz Transformations: Understanding and Deriving Acceleration Expressions

univers
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hi all , i need some help concerning the expressions for lorentz transformation of the acceleration. i couldn't derive them?. thanks. :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try to us the chain rule, mathematically, lorentz transf... is a common change of coordinates... and are not so difficult... they are linear ;D
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi univers! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Show us the question, and what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :wink:
 
univers said:
hi all , i need some help concerning the expressions for lorentz transformation of the acceleration. i couldn't derive them?. thanks. :cry:
Have a look at
A.P. French, Special Relativity, (Nelson, 1968) pp, 152-154
Probably there more recent editions!
 
bernhard.rothenstein said:
Have a look at
A.P. French, Special Relativity, (Nelson, 1968) pp, 152-154
Probably there more recent editions!

thank u very much.
:smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi univers! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Show us the question, and what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :wink:
thank u. it is kind from u
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Thread 'Relativator (Circular Slide-Rule): Simulated with Desmos - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Show Lagrangian is invariant under a Lorentz transformation without using generators
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Lorentz transformation on mode functions
Replies
7
Views
1K
B How to derive the Lorentz transformation in the simplest way?
Replies
17
Views
4K
I Question about full Lorentz transformation
3
Replies
101
Views
6K
I Follow-up on Index notation for inverse Lorentz transform
Replies
1
Views
792
I Assumption in the derivation of the Lorentz transformation
Replies
33
Views
3K
I Lorentz Transformation: Premises + Derivation
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Coord Transform in de Sitter Space: Phys Significance &Linearity?
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Is the constancy of c a postulate or a derivable theorem?
Replies
13
Views
214
B Galilean vs Lorentz Transformations: Correct Understanding?
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top