Lorentz Velocity Addition Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving Lorentz velocity addition, specifically focusing on the transformation of velocities in special relativity. Participants are examining the correct application of the velocity addition formula while considering the components of motion in different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the correct application of the velocity addition formula, questioning the use of specific variables and components. There are discussions about the necessity of calculating the x-component of velocity before addressing the y-component, as well as clarifications regarding the definitions of the variables involved in the formulas.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants providing guidance on the order of calculations and the importance of understanding the variables in the context of the problem. Some participants express confusion about the necessity of considering the x-component when the question specifically asks for the y-component.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves multiple velocities and components, leading to potential misunderstandings about the application of the formulas. There is also mention of the need to clarify assumptions regarding the rest frames of the observers involved.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
u'=u/(δ(1-(uv)/c^2)
So for the formula, u'=u/(δ(1-(uv)/c^2)

u=2.06E8 and v=0. I am only looking at the y components here.

Since v=0 it really becomes u'=u/δ or u'= u*sqrt(1-(u^2)/c^2)).

Anyways when I plug this in I am getting 1.49E8 when the answer should be 0.951E8. Am I not using the correct formula here?
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 154
Physics news on Phys.org
There are three velocities in this problem. Are you sure you're using the right one when calculating ##\gamma##?
 
vela said:
There are three velocities in this problem. Are you sure you're using the right one when calculating ##\gamma##?
Its asking for the y component, which is j hat. The particle has a y-component velocity while the moving observer does not.
 
Make sure you are taking care of the x direction relative velocity first; then you can work on the y direction relative velocity. You will need to perform relative velocity calculation twice. Keep in mind, relative motion has an effect on both time (indenpdent of direction) and space (dependent of direction).
 
guv said:
Make sure you are taking care of the x direction relative velocity first; then you can work on the y direction relative velocity. You will need to perform relative velocity calculation twice. Keep in mind, relative motion has an effect on both time (indenpdent of direction) and space (dependent of direction).
Why would I need to do x component first? Couldnt i just ignore x component and do y component since that's what the question is asking?
 
You're trying to find ##\vec v##, the velocity of the particle in the the rest frame of A. So why are you using the formula to find ##v_y'##? Also, you need to understand what the variables in the formula stand for. From your original attempt, it seems you have a misunderstanding there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
vela said:
You're trying to find ##\vec v##, the velocity of the particle in the the rest frame of A. So why are you using the formula to find ##v_y'##? Also, you need to understand what the variables in the formula stand for. From your original attempt, it seems you have a misunderstanding there.

u'=u/(δ(1-(uv)/c^2)

u' is the velocity of the object according to the individual moving at velocity v.

u is the velocity of the object according the the individual in the rest frame.

The question is asking for u`', the velocity of the object according to the individual moving at velocity v.

Am I incorrect anywhere in the above?

Except both individuals are at rest if we only look at the y-component.
 
It's a little confusing because you're mixing notation and reusing variables. According to A', the particle moves with velocity ##\vec v'##, so the usual convention is to say the particle moves with velocity ##\vec v## according to A.

JoeyBob said:
Except both individuals are at rest if we only look at the y-component.
That's not how it works.
 
vela said:
That's not how it works.
How does it work then? I've determined the x-component of the velocity to be 2.7784E8 using ux'=(ux-v)/(1-(ux*v)/c^2) where I defined the variables in the same manner. i believe my answer is correct, though I have no way of veryfying.

An earlier comment said I needed to find the x-component first in order to find the y-component. The vital part I am missing is why that is the case.
 
  • #10
You said
$$u_y'= \frac{u_y}{\gamma[1-(u_y v)/c^2]}.$$ If you write ##\gamma## in terms of ##v##, you have
$$u_y'= \frac{u_y\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}{1-(u_y v)/c^2}.$$ You set ##v=0## in the denominator but not in the numerator. Hopefully, it's obvious why you can't do that.
 
  • #11
vela said:
You said
$$u_y'= \frac{u_y}{\gamma[1-(u_y v)/c^2]}.$$ If you write ##\gamma## in terms of ##v##, you have
$$u_y'= \frac{u_y\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}{1-(u_y v)/c^2}.$$ You set ##v=0## in the denominator but not in the numerator. Hopefully, it's obvious why you can't do that.
But if I do both numerator/denominator u'=u, which isn't the right answer.
 
  • #12
JoeyBob said:
But if I do both numerator/denominator u'=u, which isn't the right answer.
First, you can find the velocity transformation equations here (summarised in the light blue box):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula#Special_relativity

Assuming you understand or accept these formulas, then all you have to do is get the variables correct.

If you are asked only for the y-component of velocity in the unprimed frame, then you don't need to calculate the x-component.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K