Lottery-type stochastics question

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunrah
  • Start date Start date
sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



n balls, numbered from 1 to n, are drawn randomly from an urn one after the other (whilst returning each ball before drawing the next). The random variable Tk represents the number of draws until k different balls have been drawn, where k = 1,..., n.

calculate:
a) P[T1 = m1 ^ T2 - T1 = m2 ^ . . . ^ Tn - Tn-1 = mn]

for mi in N.

b) show that random variables T1, T2 - T1, . . . , Tn - Tn-1 are independent

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



a)
P[T1 = m1 ^ T2 - T1 = m2 ^ . . . ^ Tn - Tn-1 = mn]

= P[m1 ^ m2 ^ . . . ^ mn] = P(m1)P(m2)...P(mn) = \prod^{n}_{i=1} P(m_{i})

ok so i think I have to work out the product from i = 1,..,n of the probabilities P(mi) but how I don't even know what the mi are.

b) I guess this means linearly independent, I don't know?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sunrah said:

Homework Statement



n balls, numbered from 1 to n, are drawn randomly from an urn one after the other (whilst returning each ball before drawing the next). The random variable Tk represents the number of draws until k different balls have been drawn, where k = 1,..., n.

calculate:
a) P[T1 = m1 ^ T2 - T1 = m2 ^ . . . ^ Tn - Tn-1 = mn]

for mi in N.

b) show that random variables T1, T2 - T1, . . . , Tn - Tn-1 are independent

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



a)
P[T1 = m1 ^ T2 - T1 = m2 ^ . . . ^ Tn - Tn-1 = mn]

= P[m1 ^ m2 ^ . . . ^ mn] = P(m1)P(m2)...P(mn) = \prod^{n}_{i=1} P(m_{i})

ok so i think I have to work out the product from i = 1,..,n of the probabilities P(mi) but how I don't even know what the mi are.

b) I guess this means linearly independent, I don't know?

Presumably, T_1=1, because the definition you gave would be "T_1 = the number of draws until 1 ball is obtained". Is that correct? (Of course, a deterministic quantity is a random variable with a degenerate probability distribution.) So, translating: T_2-1 is the number of draws until we get a ball different from the first one, T_3-T_2 is the number of draws until we get a ball different from the first two, etc. The problem is asking for the joint probability distribution of these numbers, and is then asking you to prove that these numbers are independent random variables. Linear independence has absolutely nothing to do with the problem.

To get started, I suggest you look first at the distribution of T_2-1 (it is a distribution you should have seen already!), then look at the distribution of T_3 - T_2, given a value \{T_1-1 = m_2\},; that is, you need to get
P\{T_3 - T_2 = m_3 | T_2 - 1 = m_2\} This should be a very familiar distribution. Note: here, m_2, \, m_3 = 1, 2, 3, \ldots are not specified; you need to work out what happens for any possible values of m_2, \, m_3.

After you have done these two steps you should see the pattern that emerges.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top