Low(ish) GRE Verbal score - end of the world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluewave13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gre
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concerns of a graduate school applicant who achieved a high quantitative GRE score but a low verbal score, which may impact their competitiveness at top programs. Despite a strong academic background, including a 3.8 GPA and research experience, the applicant is uncertain whether to retake the GRE to improve the verbal score, especially since some schools have minimum score requirements. There is a debate on the importance of the verbal score, with some participants noting that many top programs do not prioritize it, while others suggest that retaking the test could provide peace of mind. Additionally, tips for improving vocabulary and test preparation are shared, emphasizing the challenge of memorizing vocabulary for standardized tests. Overall, the discussion highlights the varying weight of GRE scores in graduate admissions and the personal dilemma of whether to invest time and money in retaking the test.
bluewave13
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm applying to grad school in the fall (a mix of materials science and applied physics programs), and I took the general GRE a month or so ago. I got an 800 for the quantitative but a 550 on the verbal (and a 5.5 on the writing, for what that's worth). I'm otherwise well-qualified (3.8-ish GPA at an Ivy League school, research experience, etc.), but I'm applying to the top programs where everyone is well-qualified and don't want my application thrown out due to a low GRE score. For schools that do specify a cutoff or minimum "competitive" score, that minimum is right around 550 for verbal. Even worse, Berkeley (one of my top choices) says that all scores need to be 85th percentile or above to be "competitive," but a 550 verbal is closer to a 75th percentile score. But then again, a lot of other schools don't seem to care that much.

So...should I shell out another $100+ to take the test again, or should I save my energy and money? I'd like to be able to focus on preparing applications and studying for the GRE physics. However, I consistently got 50 points higher on the verbal sections of the computed-based practice tests I took, so I'm pretty confident that I could bring my score up with some preparation. Do schools really look at the verbal score, though?

This is all kind of embarrassing...I've never had much trouble with standardized tests before, and I can write well, but I'm horrible at memorizing vocabulary. Any study tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the best way to learn vocab is to read it. unfortunately that's a tough way to prepare for a test. take it again if for nothing else than the comfort that if you don't get in you know it's not over a silly thing like a retake
 
i emailed all of the top pure math phD schools. most of them said that they don't even care about verbal scores and they don't have the average scores with them. the only exception is Michigan, which said that the avg verbal score of their accepted students is 540
 
Book of Job said:
And lo, there will come a time when he of prophecy is admitted to graduate school, and ye though his quantitative GRE score be high, and his writing score excellent, all shalt see his verbal score to be substandard. And there wilt be those who say "Let not this man of a lowish verbal score be admitted to grad school" but they will be ignored by the sinners and non-believers.

And it shall come to pass that in these dark times, the end of the world is nigh"

You decide for yourself
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
49
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top