Low Temp Limit: Paramagnet v. Einstein solid

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Geronimo23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Limit Solid
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Geronimo23
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone! So I have that the low temperature limit of a paramagnet is Ω=(Ne/Ndown)Ndown while the low temperature limit of an einstein solid is Ω=(Ne/q)q. How could I explain that these two equations are essentially the same considering their respective limits (Ndown<<N and q<<N) and that oscillators in an einstein solid have an infinite number of energy levels while paramagnets have only two? Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Geronimo23 said:
Hey everyone! So I have that the low temperature limit of a paramagnet is Ω=(Ne/Ndown)Ndown while the low temperature limit of an einstein solid is Ω=(Ne/q)q. How could I explain that these two equations are essentially the same considering their respective limits (Ndown<<N and q<<N) and that oscillators in an einstein solid have an infinite number of energy levels while paramagnets have only two? Thank you so much!
Both the paramagentic material and the Einstein solid follow the binomial distribution, as any particle is either in the state of interest or is not, and so deal with factorials. In the limit of large numbers of particles, Stirling's approximation ##(N!=N\ln(N)-N)## can be applied and rearranged for that form.