LQG, string theory and spinors - all achieve mathematical miracles

g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
LQG, strink theory and Penrose's spinor theory, or maybe it's twistor theory, I don't know, all I know is that all three theories achieve mathematical miracles in their attempts to go beyond the Standard Model - how can all three theories do this but be mutually exclusive at the same time. Or maybe they're not mutually exclusive. Are they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g.lemaitre said:
LQG, strink theory and Penrose's spinor theory, or maybe it's twistor theory, I don't know, all I know is that all three theories achieve mathematical miracles in their attempts to go beyond the Standard Model - how can all three theories do this but be mutually exclusive at the same time. Or maybe they're not mutually exclusive. Are they?
Actually, only string theorists claim that their theories make mathematical miracles.
All the others claim that they actually understand how their theories work. :wink:
 
maybe i'll get some actual quotes
 
LQG, strink theory and Penrose's spinor theory...

not really mutually exclusive, but different...like the varieties of string theory trying to be combined under "M" theory...or quantum theory versus relativity...Not only are there lots of different mathematical theories, many of them don't apply at all to our universe...that's why physics has experiments to test what's 'real' and what is not.

Maybe Penrose DID work SPINOR theory, but I suspect you mean TWISTOR theory, a major effort of his for a long time...

You can read some about twistor string theory here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twistor_theory
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top