Lucy's Stone: A Physics Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter calculator20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a stone thrown vertically upwards from a cliff, requiring calculations of maximum height and time to reach the sea. The context includes kinematics and the effects of gravity, with specific values provided for initial speed and height above sea level.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to calculate the time for the stone to reach the sea, including the use of the quadratic equation and alternative approaches based on free fall equations. Questions arise regarding the derivation of specific time values mentioned in the mark scheme.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the calculations, suggesting that the time to fall from the maximum height and the time to return to the initial height are equal. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly concerning the timing of the stone's descent.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the terminology used to describe the stone's position relative to the cliff and the hand level, indicating a need for clarity in the problem setup.

calculator20
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Lucy stands on the edge of a vertical cliff and throws a stone vertically upwards. The stone leaves her hand with speed 15m/s at the instant her hand is 80m above the surface of the sea. Air resistance is negligible and the acceleration of free fall is 10m/s/s.

First part is to calculate the maximum height reached which I've done and is 11m.

Second part is to find the time for the stone to reach the sea. I have found the correct answer of 5.8s eventually using the quadratic equation which is fine but quite tricky. This is where my question comes in.

The mark scheme also mentions as an alternative finding 4.3s as the time to fall 91m added to 1.5 for max height or finding 3 to return to hand and then 2.8 to fall 80 m. This is annoying me as I can't see where these answers come from? I assume the 1.5 comes from v/a = 15/10 and that it is doubled for 3 but how are they getting 4.3 and/or 2.8? I've tried every combination of motion equation and I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the top of the trajectory stone doesn't move, so it has to fall 91 m with acceleration g and no initial speed. That yields 4.3 s.

When the stone goes down, once it reaches the cliff level it has exactly the same speed, but opposite direction - so you have a free fall with v0 = 15 m/s (do you know why?) and 80 meters to go. That yields 2.8 s.

Up and down in 3 s is just a free fall with initial speed going up. Going up takes exactly the same time it takes to go down.
 
Borek said:
When the stone goes down, once it reaches the cliff level it has exactly the same speed...
Not the cliff level,the hand level(80 m)
 
adjacent said:
Not the cliff level,the hand level(80 m)

Good point, lousy wording on my side.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K