Lyapunov exponent - order of magnitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the calculation of the Lyapunov exponent for a chaotic pendulum, with an initial value reported as approximately 10^5, which raises concerns about its validity. It is noted that such a high exponent is unusual unless the oscillation frequency is around 100 kHz, as typical values are closer to 0.1 s^-1. The Lyapunov exponent measures the rate at which close trajectories diverge, and its calculation should ideally involve the Lyapunov spectrum for more accurate results. The method used in the discussion, which involves comparing distant points in time, is criticized for not capturing the local behavior essential for bounded systems. For a more accurate analysis, resources like Steven Strogatz's "Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos" are recommended.
dudy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Analyzing data from a chaotic pendulum, I calculated the Lyapunov exponent to be somewhere around 10^5 . While my gut tells me something is wrong with this number , i failed to find any information regarding the order of magnitude of Lyapunov exponents and their meaning.
Can someone give me a "feeling" for different magnitudes of Lyapunov exponents, or a place I can get a less theoretical and more practical read about them?
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
That value does seem far too large, unless the typical frequency of the oscillations are in the 100kHz range. The Lyapunov exponent just tells you the rate at which two close trajectories diverge (e.g. two simulations of the pendulum with slightly different initial conditions). Due to the exponential divergence in chaos, the effect doesn't usually become noticable until after several cycles of the system.

If the oscillating frequency is ~1Hz and the Lyapunov exponent is ~105s-1 then trajectories would diverge well before a single cycle. In this case it becomes very hard to define the attractor of the system. I imagine you'd need a huge number of dimensions so that trajectories wouldn't come back on themselves too quickly. A more "normal" value for the Lyapunov exponent would be ~0.1s-1.

By the way, what method are you using to calculate the exponent? For a thorough analysis you'll typically have to calculate the Lyapunov spectrum i.e. the exponent for each of the dimensions. The reason is that trajectories will diverge at different rates or even converge depending on the direction in phase space.

Hope that helps. If you need any more info then have a read of the book Nonlinear dynamics and chaos by Steven Strogatz; it explains lots of things with pictures and nice non-mathematical descriptions.
 
First of all thank you very much for the reply- it is extremely helpful.
About the method I'm using- What I did is to take two points from my data that are far apart on the time-line, but have very close values, and watch how the difference (of values) between them grows with time. I repeated this process with different pairs of points.
In light of your reply I'm guessing this is not the right way to go about it, but- why? I mean, I thought I was pretty much calculating the Lyapunov exponent "by definition" this way.
 
Yes, you're right, that is exactly how the Lyapunov exponent is defined. The reason why it's not usually calculated this way is because the exponent only defines local behaviour for bounded systems (i.e. ones that come back on themselves to form cycles). If the divergence due to the Lyapunov exponent held true for all time then the system wouldn't have an attractor, there would just be a series of exponential trajectories moving towards +/- infinity.

The standard method for calculating the Lyapunov spectrum is to plot a single trajectory of the system in phase space. This assumes you have outputs of the system for all dimensions (for chaos there should be at least 3) - if not then you can just use Takens embedding theorem on a 1-D time series to get the extra dimensions. You can then use the algorithm by Eckmann and Ruelle (http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v34/i6/p4971_1" ).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top