Magnet Moving inside Copper Tube and Current Direction(s?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a magnet falling through a copper tube and the resulting induced currents as described by Lenz's law. It is clarified that while the magnet induces currents that flow in opposite directions on either side of the tube, these currents are not simultaneous; they diminish and reverse as the magnet moves. The currents are parallel to the direction of the magnet's travel but are separated by the length of the magnet, leading to a net current of zero when the magnet is in the center of the coil. Additionally, when considering a solenoid, the same principle applies, where induced currents only occur upon entry and exit of the magnet, with no current generated while the magnet is centered. The conversation emphasizes the nuances of induced current behavior in conductive materials.
Renato_Ferrei
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first post here.

I know that, according to Lenz's law, if you drop a magnet inside a copper tube and let it fall, its movement will cause an induced current, which will slow it down in turn. However, my drawings make me believe that the direction of such current should be one below the magnet, and the other above it. For example, if the magnet is falling with its South pole down, it will induce current in a direction such that a South pole will appear right below it. However, its North pole is falling on the other side, which would also cause a South pole to appear right above it due to an induced current. But doesn't this mean that there are opposite current directions at each side of the tube? If so, how can this happen physically?

If we think about many individual spirals, instead of a single tube, everything seems to work fine, with current flowing in different directions for different spirals; however, I can't visualize the same happening within a continuous material.

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Renato, welcome to PF.

But doesn't this mean that there are opposite current directions at each side of the tube? If so, how can this happen physically?

What’s so strange about having opposite currents at different places in the tube?

Those 2 currents run round the circumference of the tube and are roughly separated by a distance approx. the length of the magnet. I say roughly because in this space they diminish, go to zero and then start building back up in the opposite direction. The magnet is traveling length ways and both currents are parallel but at right angles with direction of travel.
The sum of the 2 combined currents is zero, hence when a magnet falls through a long coil you will only see a current generated when the magnet is entering or leaving this coil.
 
Hi,

Thanks, now I understand that one current decreases smoothly to zero, and then starts again in the opposite direction, as expected.

But shouldn't these currents sum zero only when the magnet is in the middle of the coil? It seems to be the only moment when the rate of change of the magnetic flux is the same at both sides.

Another doubt just came to my mind: would the situation be analogous if we were talking about a solenoid? Because, in this case, even though the same logic applies to finding out the direction of each current, I don't think it's possible that two opposing currents exist in a solenoid - they would "meet" rather than loop separately.

Thank you for your help!
 
When you drop a magnet through a long solenoid you only get a current on entry and exit with nothing whilst the magnet's in the middle (the induced emfs are in opposite directions for N and S poles so they cancel - producing no current).
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top