# Magnetic and Electric Field Curiousity

• Noesis
In summary, the constants in both the Coloumb's Law and the Biot-Savart Law are inversely related to the distance squared. It is possible to have a gravitational analog in the Law of Gravitation since it is also inversely related to distance squared.
Noesis
Now I preface this by saying that I am still very far from having any true appreciable amount of knowledge on the subject of electromagnetism, only about 2 semesters worth. I have been trying to actively learn a lot on my lonesome and this is something I felt worth asking.

I did not want to post this question elsewhere since it has nothing to do with school, just a personal muse.

Analyzing both Coloumb's Law and the Biot-Savart Law for electric and magnetic fields, I notice that the constants involved both contain 4pi and are inversely related to the distance squared.

Putting this factor together, 4pi*r^2, would be the surface of a sphere centered at the point we are measuring from.

Since 4pi*r^2 is in the denominator, this means either the electric field or magnetic field at a point is inversely proportional to it.

Now do these factors truly stem from inverse proportionality to the surface of a sphere centered about the point of interest, or do they come from other sources?

If so, would it be feasible to have a gravitational analog in the Law of Gravitation since it is also inversely related to distance squared? Perhaps we could simply factor out a G from 4pi. I know the last bit on gravitation is a stretch, but it seems like a cool idea.

Someone shed some light on this darkness!

It's not clear what you're asking, but you might be interested to read up on the gravitomagnetic field (being verified by gravity probe B).

The 4pi factor is just a constant that appears when using SI (sisteme international) units. It depends on how the others constants (G, epsilonzero, muzero) where defined. The appearance of 4pi is NOT a law of nature.

lpfr is correct. Try looking at the SAME two equations in CGS units. No more 4pi to trouble you.

Zz.

The 4\pi is from the total solid angle of a sphere, which is about what you have deduced. In Gauss's law for a point charge, the 4 pi is natural.
In trying to remove the 4 pi from G's law, SI "rationalizes", leading to distress for EM students.
The 2 pi is from the total angle of a circle. It is naural in Ampere's law for a long straight wire. SI rationizes that too, introducing the "fundamental" constant 12.6 X 10^-7, which has nothing to do with permeability.

Noesis said:
Putting this factor together, 4pi*r^2, would be the surface of a sphere centered at the point we are measuring from.

Since 4pi*r^2 is in the denominator, this means either the electric field or magnetic field at a point is inversely proportional to it.

Now do these factors truly stem from inverse proportionality to the surface of a sphere centered about the point of interest, or do they come from other sources?

If so, would it be feasible to have a gravitational analog in the Law of Gravitation since it is also inversely related to distance squared? Perhaps we could simply factor out a G from 4pi. I know the last bit on gravitation is a stretch, but it seems like a cool idea.

Someone shed some light on this darkness!

i think you've done a commendable and insightful job of seeing a connection of concepts that they don't always teach so well in these first courses. Meir mentioned Gauss's Law, and i would add to that the concepts of flux and flux density. i would suggest looking up, in Wikipedia the articles on Flux, Inverse-square law, as well as Gauss's Law. come back with questions or clarifications after looking at that.

Thanks for all of the responses guys...you've given me insightful leads to search over.

Definitely will post something again once I do more research.

## 1. What is the difference between a magnetic field and an electric field?

A magnetic field is a force field that is created by moving electric charges, while an electric field is a force field that surrounds a charged particle.

## 2. How do magnetic and electric fields interact with each other?

Magnetic and electric fields can interact with each other through a phenomenon called electromagnetism. This occurs when a changing magnetic field induces an electric field, or when a changing electric field induces a magnetic field.

## 3. What are some practical applications of magnetic and electric fields?

Magnetic and electric fields have a wide range of practical applications, including electricity generation, motors, speakers, and medical imaging technologies such as MRI machines.

## 4. How can I protect myself from the effects of magnetic and electric fields?

To protect yourself from the effects of magnetic and electric fields, you can use shielding materials such as metal or special fabrics that can block or reduce the strength of the fields.

## 5. Can magnetic and electric fields be harmful to human health?

High levels of exposure to magnetic and electric fields can be harmful to human health. However, the levels of fields that are typically found in everyday environments are not considered to be harmful. It is important to follow safety guidelines and limit exposure to high levels of fields, such as those found near power lines or in certain industrial settings.

### Similar threads

• Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
12
Views
905
• Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
477
• Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
8
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
28
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
8
Views
822
• Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
2K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
531