Is the soft iron core the only method for concentrating magnetic fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concentration of magnetism, specifically questioning whether the soft iron core is the only method. It highlights Halbach arrays, which create an asymmetrical magnetic field by canceling the field on one side, but this is viewed as field distortion rather than true concentration. The conversation touches on the theoretical implications of Halbach arrays in relation to Maxwell's equations, which suggest that magnetic monopoles cannot exist. Despite the complexity of these equations, the basic principle of Halbach arrays is likened to arranging smaller magnets to direct the magnetic field in one direction. Additionally, it is noted that while iron is a common and effective material for concentrating magnetism, other materials, including superconductors, can also be used to create permanent magnets.
Quasaire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Is the soft iron core the only known way of concentrating magnetism? I know that Halbach arrays create a sort of "monopole" by canceling the field on one side of the magnet but that, in my opinion, is not really concentration but rather asymmetrical field distortion. Afterall, the array doesn't actually transfer the field from one side of the magnet to the other or does it?

And while I'm on the subject does contemporary physics knowledge explain why Halbach arrays work? Isn't it true that Maxwell's equations says monopoles can't exist? It would be like trying to make a sphere on flat paper? Actually I don't understand his equations, as I'm not in that high of math, but so I heard anyway.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a nice link

on Halback arrays, there's plenty more on the web. Surprising how many simple gadgets there are left to invent.

http://www.matchrockets.com/ether/halbach.html

HA are just conventional physics. Imagine a refrigerator magnet made by gluing little horseshoe magnets together so that the dipole field is all on one side, and you get the idea.

There are plenty of materials besides Iron that concentrate magnetism, Iron is cheap and effective. You can also use superconductors to make "permenant" magnets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top