Magnetic energy stored in a cylindrical conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic energy stored in an infinite cylindrical conductor carrying a stationary current. The user is confused about whether to consider the magnetic field outside the conductor when calculating the total magnetic energy, as the field is not zero beyond the conductor. They have derived the magnetic field inside and outside the conductor using Ampere's law and calculated the energy density for the inside but are unsure how to integrate for the outside. Other participants agree that both the inside and outside fields should be included and suggest using a cylindrical shell approach for the outside energy calculation. The conversation emphasizes the need to maintain consistent dimensions and units throughout the calculations.
Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


So I came across with following problem:

> Consider a cylindrical conductor of infinite length and circular section of radius a and that is traversed by a stationary current I. What is the magnetic energy stored in the conductor.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
So my question is more of a conceptual one.
I proceeded to apply Ampere's law to calculate the B field which is \begin{cases} \frac{\mu_0Ir}{2\pi a^2} \,,\, r<a\\ \\ \\ \frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r} \,,\, r>a\end{cases}

I checked the resolution of the problem and they seem to only calculate the magnetic energy on the conductor. But according to

$$\iiint_{all\,space} 0.5 B^2 \,dV$$

Shouldn't we take it all space? Because B isn't zero outside of the conductor. I'm so confused on why they just considered the conductor, am i misunderstanding something.

Also let me add that the integral in the cylinder gave us

$$\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{16 \pi}$$

I also have know idea on how to compute the integral outside the conductor. What limits of integration should I take?
I'm really confused, can someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the formula is E = 0.5 (L * I2). Then you would only need to find the inductance
 
David Lewis said:
I believe the formula is E = 0.5 (L * I2). Then you would only need to find the inductance

The goal of the exercise is to do the opposite e.g. determine E and then use that formula to get L. I didn't post that last bit because it was not relevant for the question I guess.
 
Granger said:
$$\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{16 \pi}$$

I also have know idea on how to compute the integral outside the conductor. What limits of integration should I take?
I'm really confused, can someone help me?
First, I agree with you that the B field outside the conductor must be added to that of the inside. I also agree with the given answer for just the inside mag field.

Do you know how you got the energy (per unit length BTW) for the inside energy? If so, proceed exactly the same way for the outside:
find energy in a cylindrical shell of thickness dr, length l and radius r. Compute the energy density at distance r from the center of the cylinder using the formula for B(r), r > a, which you already have. So differential energy = energy density times differential volume. The it should be obvious what the limits of integration over r have to be.

Keep the length l throughout your computations so you can check dimensions as you go, then at the end you can make l=1.
 
Last edited:
energy density magnetic or electric, both are proportional to square of the module of either B or E

so , that says there's a lot of differents ways to express the energy density of a field , since both use their own distinct constants, e0 and u0 but there is a equivalency you can do by substitution of the energy density which is part of the potential energy of a system equation, and , link that formula , the the induction formula generated by a point in space .

hope this helps, i can post the formulas if you want
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top