Magnetic field and Poynting Flux in an Inductor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Poynting Flux in the context of inductors, exploring how it relates to energy storage in magnetic fields. Participants examine the similarities and differences between Poynting Flux in inductors and capacitors, as well as the mathematical formulations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how Poynting Flux applies to inductors, seeking a comparable use to that in resistors and capacitors.
  • Another participant suggests that the roles of electric and magnetic fields are switched in inductors compared to capacitors, noting the configuration of field lines.
  • A participant proposes a method for calculating the energy stored in the magnetic field, expressing uncertainty about the appropriate formula for the electric field and the surface for integration.
  • Another participant provides a formula for the electric field based on Faraday's law and suggests the integration surface should be cylindrical, emphasizing the need to integrate over time.
  • One participant derives a formula for energy stored in the inductor and questions its equivalence to another established formula, drawing a parallel to capacitors.
  • Another participant asserts that the two formulas should be equal, pointing out a potential error in the first formula related to a factor of radius and clarifying the integration process.
  • A later reply acknowledges the identified issue and expresses satisfaction with the resolution of the problem, noting the similarity of Poynting Flux behavior in inductors and capacitors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the initial formula for energy stored in the inductor, with some asserting it is incorrect while others believe it should be equivalent to the established formula. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the relationship between the two formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential issues with the integration process and the dependence on specific definitions, such as the electric field and the geometry of the solenoid. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the integration over time and surface area.

Rafimah
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

Lately I have been studying the Poynting Flux and I am familiar with the classic examples of how it can be used to describe the power being dissipated by a resistor and the energy flowing into a capacitor, but I have never come across a similar analog for how the Poynting flux applies to an inductor. Is there some comparable use for it in this scenario?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Its sort of the same as with the case of a capacitor, but with the roles of Electric and Magnetic Field switched over:
Inside a (solenoidal) inductor the magnetic field lines are straight lines parallel to the axis of the solenoid, while electric field lines form closed loops around the magnetic field lines.

if you wondering what's happening in the poynting vector outside the solenoid, it still points towards the axis of the solenoid, the electric and magnetic field are not zero outside the solenoid (as long as the solenoid is not infinite) (the magnetic field outside a solenoid inductor resembles that of a bar magnet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VFPt_Solenoid_correct.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Magnet0873.png).

However if we consider an infinitely long solenoid with time varying current , it seems we might have a mini paradox regarding the poynting vector.
 
Last edited:
Thats interesting, so to go about solving for the energy stored in the magnetic field, here is what I was thinking:

B = mu*n*I
E = ?

S = E cross B /mu

Integrate S over the surface area of the cylindrical space inside the solenoid (?)

So the two issues I am having are that I am not sure what the appropriate formula for electric field should be, and I am not totally sure what surface the integral should be over.
 
Try ##E=-\frac{1}{2\pi r}A\frac{dB}{dt}## (this comes from properly applying Faraday's law of induction) where A the cross section area of solenoid and r its radius.

The surface of the (spatial) integration will be the solenoid view as a cylinder with radius r and cross section area A and length l. And don't forget to integrate over time as well at the end (poynting vector is energy per unit area per unit time).

The integral over time would be something like ##\int_0^{t_0}{cI\frac{dI}{dt}dt}## where c a constant that depends on A,r and length l and I(t) is the current.

Ok sorry if I edited the post too many times while maybe you reading it. I hope it is clear now.
 
Last edited:
So based on this, I get the following result after integrating over surface area and time:

U = -Lr ∫I*dI/dt*dt

I believe the energy stored in an inductor is given by the following formula.

U = (B^2*l*A)/(2*mu)

Are these equivalent? Should they be equivalent, as the integral of the Poynting flux over area and time in a capacitor is equal to the energy stored in the capacitor?
 
They should be equal. The second formula is correct.

The first formula seems incorrect by the factor of r. The factor of r should vanish with the spatial integration over the lateral surface of the cylinder(because we have the lateral surface of the cylinder ##2\pi rl## and the electric field is proportional to ##\frac{1}{2\pi r}## ,r always the radius of the solenoid.

The integral of ##\int I\frac{dI}{dt}dt## is equal to ##\frac{I^2(t)}{2}##.

So, the first formula should be (ignoring the minus sign) ##U=\frac{1}{2}LI^2(t)##. You can check that this formula is equivalent to ##U=\frac{1}{2\mu_0}B^2lA## by using that ##L=\mu_0\frac{N^2A}{l}## and ##B=\mu_0\frac{nI}{l}##.

EDIT: I see now your original expression for the B field in the post #3 of this thread, you forgot the l in the denominator. Don't know if that was the cause of the miscalculation .
 
Last edited:
Yep! That was the issue. I believe this gives a complete solution to the problem. I see how the Poynting flux in L behaves like the Poynting flux in C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
152
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K