Magnetic Field around a Bundle of Wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic force per unit length on a wire located 0.200 cm from the center of a bundle of 100 insulated wires, each carrying 1.50 A. The magnetic field is derived using the formula B = (mu_0 * I * r) / (2 * pi * R^2), where mu_0 is the permeability of free space. The participants calculated a magnetic field value of approximately 9.375e-4, indicating it falls within a range of 10% to 100% of the expected answer. They also noted the need to multiply by 100 to account for all wires in the bundle. Assistance is requested for a quick solution to finalize the calculations.
martellaj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A packed bundle of 100 long, straight, insulated wires forms a cylinder of radius R = 0.800 cm. If each wire carries 1.50 A, what are the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force per unit length acting on a wire located 0.200 cm from the center of the bundle?


2. The attempt at a solution
My friend and I have been going over this problem for a while - this is what we have come up with so far:

Without a picture, we have decided the bundle is like a pull and peel Twizzler, just a bundle of 100 straight wires. The radius that we're attempting to find the force per unit length is .200 cm away, which is obviously smaller than the radius of the entire bundle so we're using:

B = (mu_0 * I * r) / (2 * pi * R^2)

- B is the magnetic field
- mu_0 is 4*pi*e-7
- I is 1.5 A
- r is .002 m
- R is .008 m

The answer we got was something like 9.375e-4, which is apparently within 10% to 100% of the actual answer, so the answer will be in the e-4 magnitude.

Any help would be great, and sorry I couldn't write the equation all fancy-like. Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And I forgot to mention that we did in fact multiply the equation used by 100 to take in account of all 100 wires.
 
Can anyone solve this in 3 minutes? It'd be great.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top