Magnetic Field at a point between two capacitors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field between two parallel plate capacitors with given dimensions and a rate of potential increase. The user attempts to apply relevant equations, including the relationship between current, electric field change, and magnetic field. However, they encounter a discrepancy in their results, noting that their calculated magnetic field differs from the correct answer by a factor of 16. Clarification is sought regarding the interpretation of variables, specifically whether 'E' refers to electric field or voltage. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between electric field and voltage in capacitor systems.
Renaldo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plate capacitor has circular plates of radius 12.0 cm that are separated by a distance of 4.0 mm. The potential across the capacitor is increased at a constant rate of 1300 V/s. Determine the magnitude of the magnetic field between the plates at a distance r = 3.0 cm from the center.

Homework Equations



id = ε0A(dE/dt)

B = [μ0id/(2∏R2)]r

The Attempt at a Solution



id = ε0A(dE/dt)

dE/dt = 1300 V/s
A = ∏R2
R = 0.12 m
ε0 = 8.85E-12

id = 5.2E-10


B = [μ0id/(2∏R2)]r

r = 0.03 m
R = 0.12 m
id = 5.2E-10
μ0 = 1.26E-6

B = 2.17E-16

Correct answer is 3.39E-15

How do I get there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Renaldo said:
dE/dt = 1300 V/s

Note that on the left you have the rate of change of E, but on the right you have the value of the rate of change of V.

[I get an answer that differs from the stated correct answer by a factor of 16.]
 
I thought E stood for Vemf. Does it stands for Electric field?
 
E is electric field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top