Magnetic field at center of half square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field at the center of a half square due to a straight wire using the formula B = (μ/4∏)(I/R)(sinθ2 - sinθ1). The user is confused about which angles to use for the calculation, initially suggesting angles from 0 to 45° for the vertical sides and considering 45° and 135° for the top side. A response clarifies that the correct angle for the closest point should be 0°, and the angles for the vertical sides should be ±45°. It is recommended to verify the calculations using the Biot-Savart law for accuracy. Understanding the correct angles is crucial for determining the magnetic field correctly.
HelpMeh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having some trouble understanding the formula for the magnetic field for a straight wire.

The equation is:

B = (μ/4∏)(I/R)(sinθ2 - sinθ1)

the picture looks like this:

...___
__| . |____

with the current coming in from the left. To find the magnetic field at the point (middle) You need two angle, which is where the issue comes up. I am not sure which two angles to use.

What i know:

im pretty sure to find the magnetic field generated by the vertical sides you would sweep out an angle from 0 to 45° (from bottom of the side to the top). then multiply by 2 since both sides will create the same B field, i have no idea what to use for the top side, possibly angle 1 being 45 and angle 2 being 135, but you get zero if this is done.any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi HelpMeh! :smile:
HelpMeh said:
Hi, I am having some trouble understanding the formula for the magnetic field for a straight wire.

The equation is:

B = (μ/4∏)(I/R)(sinθ2 - sinθ1)

im pretty sure to find the magnetic field generated by the vertical sides you would sweep out an angle from 0 to 45° (from bottom of the side to the top). then multiply by 2 since both sides will create the same B field, i have no idea what to use for the top side, possibly angle 1 being 45 and angle 2 being 135, but you get zero if this is done.

You're using the wrong θ :redface:

θ for the closest point is 0, not 90° …

so your angles will be ±45° …

(and for an infinitely long wire would be ±90°)

i suggest you check this by applying the Biot-Savart law. :wink:
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
670
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Back
Top